Recent Posts
Heil Hitler
zGOcOw
No.309840
>”hitler was contemptuous of indians saar”
>as if british thought highly of pajeets
>at least germans were high IQ, superior technical capabilities and engineering
Heil Hitler, now say it with me
azYr4o
No.309841
>>309840(OP)
>at least germans were high IQ, superior technical capabilities and engineering
British did this doe
zGOcOw
No.309842
>>309840(OP)
and they DEFINITELY got the drip
zGOcOw
No.309844
>>309841
Anglo Saxons were ethnic Germans who migrated 1000 years prior and occupied the british islands so picrel was still German achievement
Pdr4Me
No.309851
>>309841
I will bite. British victory around the world was mostly due to diplomacy and conquering primitive tribes. Their only impressive achievement was in India, which again was won mostly due to stepping in after native allies had killed each other. Regions like egypt , arabia , came under British control due to european alliance system and weakened ottoman empire.
37NYoC
No.309857
>>309840(OP)
Most underrated thing about hitler is that he ensured highest number of piggers were killed and then he killed himself.
Pdr4Me
No.309863
>>309851
>Canada a penal colony largely taken from sm tribes and eskimos , with a largely empty continent.
>Same in australia and New zealand.
Remember the british barely won against the afghans
Pdr4Me
No.309864
>>309857
Kek based.
vQDcQh
No.309865
>>309851
Yes most of it was just being at the right place at the right time for them but you can't deny that no other empire in future will touch the control of landmass that big ever again. Bongs should have collaborated with germans and japs, they would have still been ruling major parts of the world then.
nufpUb
No.309867
>>309841
But anglo saxons were also germans, just that they were inbred unlike Germans. It's not like I like any white race, but Germans actually were smart unlike inbred Brits, their war tech was on a different level.
vQDcQh
No.309869
>>309863
Tbh everyone has lost against them in some way or another.
nufpUb
No.309880
>>309869
Being cunning and sycophant, and i say this in objectivity can be a very good traits, when you know other empires are busy clashing, you can simply wait for them to tire themself out and slowly consume them over time. It lacks "honor" and spine but it is easily most functional way of going about it.
vQDcQh
No.309888
>>309880
Just make chinks fight in afganistan and it will bankrupt their whole economy like USSR.
FsE5hI
No.309894
>>309851
You are wrong and every point can be argued. British infact were against worse odds than mongolians. Only reasons they even lost their colonies because Ww2 did a number on them and they weren't as barbaric as previous century empires
nufpUb
No.309900
>>309888
I would prefer that if Baloch actually managed to liberate itself. I definitely like Afghan much more than pakis, that too by a margin. Afghans have given us some absolute kinos occasionally kek.
vQDcQh
No.309901
>>309894
They also gave up a lot of their colonies due to pressure from Jewsa for gibs to rebuild their country like other europoor countries after ww2.
Same goes for japan who were thoroughly emasculated.
nufpUb
No.309921
>>309894
Mongols faced far worse odds over the course of history, conquering empires many times their size, unlike the inbreds who often fought divided foes. For instance if India was a singular empire like it was in period of Ashoka rather than being fragmented, British would have been raped as soon as they over stepped their boundaries.
Britain’s fall came from pre WWII nashunalistic pressures rather than the postwar debt (£25 bil by 1945). Yes it was not "openly" violent when we compare it to Mongol slaughter, it caused mass deaths like the bhangal 1943 and the Mau Mau in 1952. That is actually a very weak ground to defend the Britards.
nufpUb
No.309931
>>309901
>BDL Crusher Juicer Three Thousand
I finally see Tamil Lulli's love for Cume.. I mean, America
Pdr4Me
No.309932
>>309865
What's the point of such an imperial territory they won barely with war? Napoleon's victory over 5 coalitions , Hitler's nazi empire , and obviously the Mongol Empire far exceeds all of them.
vQDcQh
No.309934
>>309921
Funny how the mongols were never able to conquer us but bongs did.
Pdr4Me
No.309937
>>309869
Well by tht logic indians have defeated the british many times
nufpUb
No.309938
>>309934
Actually now that you mention it, it IS kind of funny, feels like rock paper scissor even
vQDcQh
No.309939
>>309937
Conquer/=defeat
vQDcQh
No.309941
>>309938
Also the fact that they were defeated by chuslims kek, finally humara musalman kuch kaam toh aaya.
Pdr4Me
No.309942
>>309894
How were British at worse odds? Atleast in india, Mughal empire was declining , Marathas had fucked themsleves in Panipat, india was divided into many petty kingdoms. Around the world the Spanish and portuguese empire was getting poor and napoleon stubbed himself in Russian snow.
v4xMpd
No.309943
>>309941
lmao what is that image
vQDcQh
No.309947
>>309942
>Spanish and portuguese empire was getting poor
Not thier fault, they were busy SEXXOing Aztec qtpies.
Pdr4Me
No.309948
>>309894
Ww2 is again a petty excuse britain gives for decolonisation. Britain was bankrupt after ww1 and during great depression too. During the panic of 1870s there was a legit fear britain would be overthrow yet britain held on. Britain decolonised after 1940s simply because it could not. When Indians told the british to leave all other colonies realised britain had to fuck off. The same indians tht helped British colonise the world also helped ending their umpire.
Pdk4yj
No.309949
>>309941
maa chod di thi katwo ki mongols ne, [Blocked URL: https://www.unknownsoldierspodcast.com/post/february-10-1258-the-mongol-sack-of-baghdad]
Pdr4Me
No.309950
>>309934
Bong? Bengali?
Pdr4Me
No.309952
>>309941
Yes but that's not whole story. Mongol armies were also defeated in rajasthan by natives. And Bengali Senas in the East.
AusHP1
No.309953
>>309840(OP)
Glaze their ways not the Nazis themselves, retard.
Pdk4yj
No.309955
Pdr4Me
No.309956
>>309947
This meme would fit for the French who made relations with native Americans and married their women with generally nice relations with them. The Spanish were subhumans coming with a jew who exterminated the redindians and burnt their history books. Total crime tht doesn't get highlighted. English were mid
Pdr4Me
No.309958
>>309955
Indian Muslim generals and Turks in india did defeat mongols
Pdr4Me
No.309961
>>309840(OP)
Shitler was a loser with one ball
vQDcQh
No.309962
>>309955
Yaar those were different katuwas, apne katuwe alag the.
Pdk4yj
No.309965
Pdk4yj
No.309970
>>309961
midwit , dont believe anything you see on plebbit
vQDcQh
No.309973
>>309956
Women like bad boys anon not nice guys, you think the Aztec women weren't creaming themselves when the Spanish killed off thier cuck husband infront of them to rape them?
Pdr4Me
No.309979
>>309965
Nothing would have happened. The mongols would have swept in the plains mass killed ppl like timur killed and sooner or later would have died smwhere in the ghats or bay of Bengal. If they formed sm lasting kingdom it would have most likely adopted islam and then intermarried with indians so smthing like Mughals.
Pdr4Me
No.309982
>>309970
One ball thing is fake. But he was a loser.
vQDcQh
No.309983
>>309965
Get mass genocided by mongols and then the remaining hindus would have been converted to islam due to mongols slowly becoming muslims and marrying among them (turks).
Pdr4Me
No.309990
>>309983
>Remaining hindus would have
Nope. Highly unlikely. The mongols were hardly anything unique in brutality like pop culture shows.
nufpUb
No.309992
>>309941
What is that image lmao 
Pdk4yj
No.310000
>>309982
Hitlers personal physician confirmed that the claim is bullshit. popularized by british propaganda songs
Pdr4Me
No.310011
>>310000
Whi to bola
Pdk4yj
No.310028
>>310011
sorry, i though it was "one ball is fake"
FsE5hI
No.310036
>>309948
>Ww2 is again a petty excuse britain gives for decolonisation.
Bhai ab mai kya kahu iss aadmi se
Pdr4Me
No.310053
>>310036
Go ahead give another of his british cope.
>Ignores great depression britain
>Ignores ww1 britain
iNQN5D
No.310250
>>309950
Bong means british as well
T9f3TL
No.310272
>>309840(OP)
abbe bhangi chamar
Hitler never met any Indian in his life
same like half of the world
all they knew about indians came from the potty mouth britishers , notorious in propaganda
same thing is happening with social media today
none have met or visited india. all they see is bot farms dictating their views of india
9jolat
No.310276
>>310272
>same thing is happening with social media today
>none have met or visited india
If they met things would be alot worse than
Pdr4Me
No.310327
>>310272
Will meeting an indian change his view? I doubt. Hitler did meet Indians. He had them in waffen ss. He met subhash chandra bose.
Pdr4Me
No.310328
>>309973
Nope.
s3NpNL
No.310387
>>309840(OP)
the americans literally had an entire aircraft carrier reserved to FUCKING SHIP ICE CREAM TO THE FRONTLINES. the german scouts were literally wondering why the fuck the allied forces were leaving their trucks on idle when they werent in use. the germigger officercels were mostly travelling on fucking horses, and their ubertöönker panzers would stall and explode when exposed to an incline greater than 10 degrees. even fucking india itself was in a way better financial situation compared to germany from 1918-1950
