Recent Posts
SGTOW ideological thread
Physiognomy
राम के नाम, बाबरी के विध्वंसकों का स्मरण
Poetry Thread.
Critique/Critiqueing, or: Rationality/Irrationalit...
Question to /iti/hAskars
Parliamentary Debating
Can you speak any special dialect besides the gene...
Bihar eastern up is source of all major religions in India post hinduism, >Jainism >Buddhism >Sikhism In fact, same region was hub for North Black Polish Ware culture which coincides with first set of urbanization post fall IVC and it was first ...
The British Raj archives
Why do women love him?
Schopenhauer
chart thread
Book recommendations
/erg/ e-reader general
Didn't know there was a new Dan Brown novel out bh...
Reading it now. It's great. Feel like I'm back in my school and college days.
Greco-Romans
Ayatollah
Youtube essays
Tareekh e Lahore by Kanhiya Lal
हिंदी दिवस
Bihari Pyscho
Annihilation of Caste

t9JQcq
No.309
His thought-process mirrors that of a lot of based Hindu nationalists as well (Savarkar, Aurobindo, etc), but he reaches an entirely different conclusion with it.
Was Ambedkar correct?
D+JzKk
No.310
Read worshipping false god by arun shoruie. It reveals his true nature . Also you can refer to recent posts from pure economics (keshav bedi)

VOOobV
No.311
>>309(OP)
>Was Ambedkar correct?
No, he was full of shit and retarded. If SC, ST and Mahar (indian) managed to get to the majority in all public sectors and were running goverment he'd be silent like a giddy fat bald fuck ugly bastard he was. It has, never been about equality, it was simply about "but what about me".
He didn't even want decimation of (indian), he just wanted restriction of who claims which (indian) to be removed. That's literally like saying, one has issues with use of AI, but not if he gets to use it for free. He snowballed his way to greatness, credited for a constitution that he actually was inherently against creating.
His poorly formed thought process mirrors a lot of based hindu because any subhuman knows that is the best way to make all your shitty ideas seem acceptable to general public. He reached a different conclusion entirely because again, this subhuman balding fuck had an entirely different confirmation bias. No, he was not correct.
vRieBc
No.312
>>309(OP)
>based hindu nationalists
There was nothing based about them. They were weak people who hid behind religion




















































