Recent Posts
poll thread
?
OIpJ6x
No.4557
I have come to a conclusion after doing extensive research on this topic .
Indian Castes that score aasi in 30s and lower than that had 35+ ehg or even 40 ehg .
While Castes/tribes which score aasi above 40 or 50 had higher aasi and zagros or ehg was added later .
You can come with question or some additions or you can also disagree with me with valid reasons.
Also i would like to have a quality discussion on this topic , so if you are not well versed on this topic pls respectfully leave.
Also o reject both AIT/AMT. If you promote AIT/AMT I will not reply
bPJz9o
No.4558
>>4557(OP)
Can you please let me how how did the ad mix exactly take place.
Which was the purest geno in the beginning, then which group merged with it later. In the chronological manner. Dumb it down for me and the Bhangis please, that being said, I am asking this strictly for the sake of knowledge.
bjio7p
No.4559
>>4557(OP)
>Also o reject both AIT/AMT. If you promote AIT/AMT I will not reply
?? You believe in OIT
OIpJ6x
No.4561
>>4558
There are many reason i have read.
One of the most prominent reasons with castes with 30s assi or lower is that they often took females from other groups because they had not enough females for every male of their tribe/caste.
Now coming to the tribes/castes with 40s or high aasi is that like take for example reddys they score 45aasi, these are the tribes/castes which went into south india and males married the local females forming a whole another group , this can also be explained by their haplogroups , Their Y-DNA(father’s side) are 80-90% west eurasian while their mtdna(mother’s side) is local indigenous haplogroups.
OIpJ6x
No.4562
>>4559
Yup
As soon as india starts investing in archeology and genealogy these things will be proven very easily.
