Recent Posts
poll thread
Western imperialism in South Asia
JDPkGU
No.3916
Am i right in thinking that since the west is done with regime changes/invasions/coopting revolutions like ithe middle east and color revolutions in the former Soviet states, they are now moving on to South Asia?
Many events are converging.
First, they have major allies in basically every region in the world except for South Asia. So they will try. And they have strategic interests in South Asia to contain China.
The rapid rise in hate against Indians is also suspicious and doesnt feel organic at all. Canadians, Irish, and now Australians? Even my normie friends got all this in their instagram. This is almost certainly a psyop. Think about this for a second. Why are westoids so obsessed with what dehatijeets do in some slum that even we dont care about and make it viral with millions of views? Something is fishy.
The easy fix to migrants is to just make a policy to prevent them from coming. Thats it. Instead they make all these social media accounts just to dehumanise Indians. At least for the muzzies/blacks they could dehumanise them as terrorists/rapists/criminals and justify invading their countries. But since Indians dont do that, at least not the ones who migrate to the west, they use stupid shit like street food, smell or whatever. They have basically made many think of Indians as smelly locusts literally associated with shit. That would make any amount of military intervention and south asian deaths not that bad according to the world eyes...
The recent revolutions in Nepal, Bangladesh and
Lanka, as well as supporting pro-US Pakistani military over Imran Khan are further proof.
Many domestic instabilities in India are also popping up and can be coopted. You see many accounts talking about how what happened to the aforementioned countries should happen in India too.
So basically I think that the west is trying to break or at least pressure India. I think a lot of secessionist movements are going to pop up. If these movements manage to break India, the only major deterrent fron western intervionism in South Asia would be lost. This would turn into a war torn hellscape with anarchists, warlords, gangs, NATO and the Chinese bombing/invading places and toppling regimes to their will.
I believe dark times are ahead of us.
ncFytU
No.3917
>>3916(OP)
Very reasonable but
Let the chips fall where they may
Indra mere sath hai
Total dyasu/timmy death
ILEHSO
No.3920
Good thread.
>>3916(OP)
We have Russia, and actual stable infra that I don't think any other country in South Asia besides parts of Pakistan have. 80% of Nepal works in the informal economy and Bangladesh heavily relies on agriculture and textiles manufacturing so their economies were unstable from the very start.
In contrast, India's economy is massive. It is much more diverse than anywhere else in the subcontinent and can even claim more variety than half of Europe. We have manufacturing, carmaking, telecom, huge reserves of materials, the perfect climate for agriculture (carried out in both seasons here, unlike in the West where the winters kill crops), and last of all IT and financial services
Our only problem is in agriculture, the fucking productivity. Too many people view owning land as a status symbol and source of mere passive income and regulations are far too tight to allow growth in the agricultural sector. Not to mention nearly three-fourths of our fertile land is NOT irrigated with the bulk of projects taking place where? Fucking Rajasthan and Haryana where the land is drier and not half as useful as the farms in Uttar Pradesh or Bihar where agriculture is much more important to the State and has a more suitable, warmer and wetter climate as well.
2+cZas
No.3933
>>3920
I dont think economy really matters to that extent... the biggest problem with india isnt completely overthrowing the government, because we are too big for that. But secessionist movements. If one such movement happens in mainland India, that too in one of the richer states, it will be the beginning of the end.
0F5Ues
No.3966
>>3916(OP)
these are countries which were fated to be vassal states.
we might see another revolution in pakistan or bhutan, but not here.
d6u4Mk
No.3968
>>3916(OP)
It is an unreasonable expectation to expect a violent rebolushun in lundia. No such thing has ever occured in lundian history and the state is competent in its preservation to fall to such a thing.
rSRUBD
No.3969
rSRUBD
No.3970
>>3968
Complacency is never good.
They managed to make the ussr fall, which was far more resilient, comoetent and powerful, and whose downfall was more unexpected than ours might be.
d6u4Mk
No.3971
>>3970
lundia is filled with the most lumpen of lumpenproles, nothing eber happens is most trve here.
rSRUBD
No.3972
>>3971
Our surrounding countries populations are even more lumpen amd they managed to have a revolution...
Again you can never be sure.
pRwyqS
No.3980
>>3933
Right but don't forget secessionist movements in India are limited to the poorest states. Only rich state I can think of where it could happen is maybe Tamil Nadu and even that is unlikely
