Is unity in diversity such a good thing
pyL5LB
No.2121
Look at all successful countries anons, they are mostly homegenous and have adjacent cultures, India is opposite of that.
Is too much diversity holding India back?
B3Nyan
No.2124
>>2121(OP)
Strong leaders and a general population with primary education would fix most of the problems India has
11eEqG
No.2125
>>2121(OP)
All first world contries have ONE common language and ONE major religion.
6Yv9Mt
No.2126
pyL5LB
No.2127
>>2122
Humans naturally form tribes.
Japan, Sweden, Scotland etc are nation states.
India, pakistan, US aren't.
Nation states last as long as its nation (people) does.
If tomorrow all the ethnic japanese are replaced by somalians, the nation state of japan will cease to exist.
India isn't a nation state.
World's biggest wars were a really waged by homogenous nation states.
Go and search up the ethnic make up of "nation states" such as sweden, Ireland, norway etc for 99% of existence.
One thing - Nations can sometimes loose state power. Example - poland ceased to exist as a state multiple times in its history, however the polish people the nation survived.
Sometimes Nations take over another states, and redefine them.
France as state was actually established by Franks who were a Germanic tribe that mass migrated in 5th century after Roman Empire's collapse, before Roman conquest, modern France was actually populated by Celtic Gauls (related to Irish people).
pyL5LB
No.2128
>>2126
Ethnicity/tribe is a better word
jMPD7m
No.2129
>>2127
Stop this anglo wignat slop that has never been true and won't ever be
wc1syT
No.2130
jMPD7m
No.2131
>>2130
Obv now it's even worse lol
wc1syT
No.2132
>>2131
that's what I am saying, you picked a degenerate timeline to prove a point, guess what is also following with this?
