Recent Posts
poll thread
NuExzq
No.1789
If not for most of India's belief in and devotion towards lord Shiva and common animosity against muslims, India would have been balkanized long ago
cnGj38
No.1811
>>1789(OP)
Why is there 2 MPs but TN AP and northern SL amalgamated?
More importantly, why hasn't Mao the Shizo steamrolled Kashmir, Nepal, Sikkim, Bhutan and Assam already?
WxFCCQ
No.1812
Yes and? What about it? Nothing esoteric about it, Hinduism is uniting factor here.
SXsdwb
No.1838
>>1789(OP)
I would honestly prefer a divided lundia like this over one where bimarus can freely enter and live in my cities but only if other countries in Asia too agrees to split up by ethnic lines and no state could theoretically accrue enough power to take over another state.
ibDshG
No.1847
>>1789(OP)
Who made this map? Those border are ugly as shit. If this was the actual poltical part, then a lot of states would just be puppets to bigger states nearby them.
Phpc2g
No.1850
Ngl , but we could have 50 years of self development like germany holy roman empire under delhi with each state will full autonomy . We could have reunified in the new world order of 21st century probably in 1990s . After reunification , we can actually have claims on pok and even pakistan region because no islamic nation
x6oeoW
No.1852
>>1850
A holy Roman Empire like situation already existed before the British. Almost every lundian king including the marathas considered the mughal 'emperor' as le 'ceremonious emperor' until the British deposed off them.
57WGe7
No.2001
>>1852
lol no they didnt
Maratha Empire specifically carved out a 'Hindavi Swaraj' and made the remaining nawabs of purvanchal paytribute
MRo3mD
No.2006
>>1838
If you want Bimarus out of your state, simply demand a limit to inter state migration, same way texas does. How you feel is irrelevant here. Does your state needs Bimaru or not, is the real question.
MRo3mD
No.2007
>>1852
>Ceremonious emperor
Lmao, no they didn't. With a very few exceptions for certain Rajput clans who were found of how well Akhbar was as a ruler, nearly every other Mughal ruler was pissed upon.
Maratha in particular consider Mughals a joke.
kEy0WY
No.2247
>>2007
>Maratha is parata saar, shivaji was super brahmin and had ijraaeli wife saar
>Shivaji father was not a worker of Mughal saar
>Sorry saar I check that shivaji son was tortured and killed saar
Bruh face it . Marathas were always against "india" and sided with british . They tried to conquer a dying empire and still got fucked by an islamic abdali HAHA .
nJ4fFa
No.2248
>>1789(OP)
>North vs south division
>Language division
>Caste based division
>Divison on which god they pray(Shivite vs Vaishnavite)
Why is handoo like this
kWez/c
No.2537
>>1789(OP)
It's actually, the Indian army giving up fighting for regional cause :3 they just retired and disbanded themselves for a whole of 3 weeks where there was not ARMY in the country and all the regional people had to recognize the Indian sub-continent instead :3 it happened before the country went "Republic" that's the reason we celebrate the Republic day :3
