![qLGIz.qR4e.1-small-FBI-Director-Kash-Patel-and[1].jpg](/images/uploads/b/thumbnails/thumb-1765936022080_9800.jpg)
Controversial take???
uTXBx6
No.390226
Best generations for indic civilization:
1) Gupta Empire
2) republic (us)
3) early vedic/can be tied with Marathas
Lowest three
1)islamic age (will include multiple)
2)post vedic (puran writing time)
3)british raj from 1850s to 1930s
qj3Vd2
No.390228
>>390226(OP)
Mughal Empire was highest point
xD7kwZ
No.390233
>>390226(OP)
Not controversial but i will go.
Best generations in the order.
1. Gupta - due to the urbanization they led.
In south you can combine cholas/cheras/pandyas. as honrary number 1.
2. Mauryans - the ideals mentioned in edicts are definitely way higher in human value. solely due to that. and expansion.
3. Honrary small kingdoms here and there Vijayanagara. Rajputs who defended and carried on during the toughest times. And marathas too.
4. The current.
Worst
>Islamic age
Solely cuz it was peak stagnation, india was drained and our scientific output came to the halt completely. It's pretty much our dark ages except few good buildings here and there.
>British
Colonialism the darbaris which carried on after british were their slaves and never bothered delving deeper they repeated and strengthened the british divisive propaganda. They never authored how british caused this division and worsed.
Entire blame was put on brahmins but no mention on how industrialization destroyed all the shudra communities because they were no longer competitive.
The sheer mark effect on the psyche of the average Indian is yet to be removed. The average 'indologist' who were british were more honest in their pursuit compared to the complete toxic waste which came to life post independence.
They have done most damage to the understanding of average Indian's idea of the Indians, divided our society further. Damage which has been deep.
uTXBx6
No.390234
>>390228
Not really Indic but ok
Plus katue don't forget Mughals started peaking after u finally were able to convert few high (indian) Hindus from money lalach before that u were all barbarian retards
xD7kwZ
No.390235
>>390228
>gets mogged by small kerala kingdom when it comes to scientific and mathematical output
very reason why we couldn't even have a industrial age can be attributed to the stagnation during mughals.
uTXBx6
No.390237
>>390233
I didn't not put mauryans cuz bhangi ashoka ruined the hardwork of his father and grandfather but yeah they good
xD7kwZ
No.390241
The biggest mistake around mauryans was them turn towards pacificism thanks to buddhist and even jain ideology. Which proly destined the land to fall.
The damage of british was almost complete societal destruction of Indians, entire society was then rewritten and forced to act from the dubious lenses of the criminals. No honest work has been done by indologist on this. Their whole work went into carrying the same british propaganda post independence to keep society divided.
xD7kwZ
No.390243
>>390237
yeah, i included just due to the way higher level of you can say philosophical ideas about society and extended nature. and obviously pan indian empire. but it was not even not as closed in organization.
DEfV7B
No.390336
>>390228
I think IVC was the highest point, relatively speaking for it's time period.
xD7kwZ
No.390337
>>390336
it was first urbanization period in a way so true
n2PHXx
No.390362
>>390235
Do you think india really deserved an industrial age when couldn't even manage defending our Territories from literal ooga boogas from central asia?
Europe did it quite well
xD7kwZ
No.390364
>>390362
>europe did quite well
not really the type of advances employed by central asian hoards were not suitable in europe
Indians not able to defend doesn't mean the scientific and mathematical output was bad. It's just that those output were not directly going into military aspects or updation. Separate issues.
xD7kwZ
No.390366
And it's dumb to say indians couldn't defend. Indian defended and halted the arab conquest.
it's later when they fell. they never got fully subdued. and fought back through marathas it's just that there was too little time for marathas to actually catch up and build a base.
o7UkIf
No.390607
>>390362
This is rubbish, steppe horsemen were very skilled and they conquered eastern Europe a lot of times. In India the central asians won smtimes and lost smtimes too
