Recent Posts
Why is india so mediocre?
yKlxTq
No.168838
Rarely find people who are passionate about any field be it science, history, business or art. Even the intelligent people here just use their intelligence to get a gobarmint job like babu, teacher, bank officer etc or being some corporate wagie. What about innovation, invention, novel ideas, breakthroughs? How come people here are enthusiastic about cars and tech yet we dont produce competent engineers and dont have a booming automobile or tech industry. Its as if we just want to stay mediocre. Neither are we horrible like subsaharan africa nor are we great like the west and east asia.
q1+Z49
No.168840
>>168838(OP)
We are even worse than sub saharan Africa what are you talking about
XQrbWT
No.168844
rope and reroll blackpille
g8MZs4
No.168847
Profits don't come from innovation here.
They come from exploitation - getting the most cheapest labor possible, and with cheapness comes doing the bare minimum necessary for survival and focusing efforts on something else that's not "innovation".
We don't "make in India", we assemble in India.
Innovation comes from thinking, discussions, silence, pondering, research, funding, inventions, etc.
Meanwhile people like Narayana Murthy complain about working 90 hours a week so he can get fat and rich.
90% of the country is "informal" btw. Those people that you talk about - the babus and the corporate wagies are only 10%. 70% of the population is poor and wouldn't have even finished high school. For them, government jobs mean "security", not having to see their family starve.
>people here are enthusiastic about cars and tech
They're just 5 to 10% of the consoomers in the market who can afford to have a credit card. The 70% of people in bumfuck villaes still use bicycles and feature phones and for them an electric car would be science fiction. Most "start ups" in India like Swiggy or Ola or some shieet expects profit from THESE consumers. The "upper middle class".
>booming automobile or tech industry
No funding, no investment, foreign players are imposed with sanctions and tariffs because local players don't want their inferior products to get threatened, etc. etc.
lBqb1Z
No.168849
>>168838(OP)
Since our birth we are wired to just survive in this system, which comes at the cost of dreams, ambitions, passions...
Our third worlder brains are subconciously geared towards hoarding more and to secure our survival. No innovation happens with this scarcity mindset.
This scarcity mindset turns people into chimps fighting each other of whatever is left worth getting in this country
yKlxTq
No.168852
>>168847
You are describing the symptoms of the problem not the root cause. One can ask why those issues dont affect all societies equally.
XQrbWT
No.168855
>>168852
haan pajeet, you just want to say same thing, we are low iq subhuman shitskins, are you happy now? time to rope and reroll blackpiller
XQrbWT
No.168857
people here are unironically so retarded, here is the same 2-3 neets with same posting pattern and same 2-3 bhosadpillas with same posts, bhangis doesnt even put effort into changing images they use for threads and there is same retards like gayush for entertaining such subhumans and not banning them outright.
g8MZs4
No.168868
>>168857
Aren't there like only 16 unique posters who use this shithole anyway?
>>168852
>One can ask why those issues dont affect all societies equally.
We got dealt with shit cards. India is just a sinking ship that's trying its best to stay afloat. I hope China invades Taiwan in a few months. Rape and reroll is the only option for the whole nation.
Gx2BBP
No.168870
>>168868
For you a country that build hypersonic missiles and is fastest growing economy is a sinking ship, only thing you do is project your life on others rakulchamar. Pajert you couldn't even hold a 20k job but have opinions on everything why not slit your throat you low iq subhuman
g8MZs4
No.168874
>>168870
A country that can build hypersonic missles can't even build proper accessible toilets though.
Gx2BBP
No.168880
>>168874
Nice try ragebaiting abo
g8MZs4
No.168885
>>168880
Nah
IxPCbM
No.168888
>>168838(OP)
>Rarely find people who are passionate about any field be it science, history, business or art. Even the intelligent people here just use their intelligence to get a gobarmint job like babu, teacher, bank officer etc or being some corporate wagie
intelligent people stay with intelligent people unfortunately. I'd reject lynn's iq map seeing how awfully biased its against developing nations.(nepal had a recorded avg iq of about 40! according to lynn).
You also have to consider that india is really poor? what would you expect from a 3k $ pci nation?
NUbQqQ
No.168904
Don't you faggots act like you're any better. This place is just gossiping about namefaggotry and whinning about wahmen. You all display the worst of the jeet traits.
NjY9b7
No.168908
>>168838(OP)
The ones who are passionate are often hated by everyone including this chan. We have had instances where high IQ people were bullied away and no am not talking about motivtroon or rakultroon or any cringepeddler like cuckyush
>t. knower
!4zArHVQAqBJzfxP
nP5HL+
No.168912
>>168848
This is so much similar to gayee percentile kek
gzLxJ1
No.168914
>>168838(OP)
Perfectly explained
g8MZs4
No.168918
>>168912
Yes, it's called Zipf Law.
KB0Kod
No.168932
>>168838(OP)
Great people always came from aristocracy and privilage
>Ambedkar
>Napolean
>Modi
Nearly every popular "leader" became something if he came from riches and strong connections
Most Indians live in poverty and the ones who can do anything are not neurotic enough and are culture discouraged by the culture too
The only way India produces something worthwhile is if people are battered down by the culture itself to do it
TLDR pajeet kuch nahi kar sakte
yKlxTq
No.168963
>>168888
>nepal had a recorded avg iq of about 40 according to lynn.
Thats untrue. Lynn estimated nepal iq to be 70 to 80. That 40iq figure comes from a separate study he mentioned in his book but he didnt take it at face value considering nutritional deficiencies in illiterate and poverty stricken remote mountains of nepal. He reasoned the nepali iq to be not that far off its neighbour's, india.
>You also have to consider that india is really poor.
Thats a chicken and egg problem. Are poor nations low iq cuz they are poor or does low national iq result in poverty? Given that several studies have shown iq is largely hereditary and associated with better life outcomes for individuals, you can make up your own mind as to how this applies to nations.
O5WCd9
No.168964
>>168844
Muh me le le whitepille
36qCJQ
No.168965
>>168838(OP)
Indians, even in their ambitions and dreams aspire for mediocrity. IIT then a 25 lpa wagie job. It is good for a country like India but around the 1st world it is mediocrity.
YYv7mi
No.168968
dSTeoF
No.168969
>>168965
Tujhse toh iit bhi nahi hua, keep seething pajeet
IxPCbM
No.168970
>>168963
>Are poor nations low iq cuz they are poor or does low national iq result in poverty?
all of this is a lack of hindsight, koreans were dirt poor in the 50s and early 60s. If an iq study were to be done then, the general inference would be poor results which are corroborated by poor pci. Of course, history proved us wrong. Your hypothesis only really makes sense if we talk about it at the end of time. When we all the hindsight and can actually claim so.
YYv7mi
No.168973
>>168932
2 out of those 3 weren't great leaders
Ambedkar wasn't even a leader, he lost elections in a seat reserved for chamars lmao
As for Napolean
>Napoleon's family was of Italian origin. His paternal ancestors, the Buonapartes, descended from a minor Tuscan noble family who emigrated to Corsica
Humans, Animals, Plants are all a function of Birth.
yKlxTq
No.168993
>>168970
The point is koreans became rich as soon as they adopted free market economy and indistrialization. National iq has to be high according to lynn for industrialization. China too was poor up until market reforms in 1979. But as soon as they opened up their economy they developed rapidly. We opened up our economy just 10 years late yet difference in economy is huge between india and china. Vietnam opened up their economy at the same time as us. They were poorer than us in 1992 yet their gdp per capita today is greater than ours. Middle eastern countries are very rich due to oil yet they score low iq.
IxPCbM
No.168997
>>168993
>We opened up our economy just 10 years late yet difference in economy is huge between india and china.
no, not really, we've opened our economy 13 years behind china and have consistently reported hdi 13-15 years behind china since then.
IxPCbM
No.169015
>>168993
besides vietnam has been richer than us since 2006? and we're growing much faster than them?
IxPCbM
No.169020
>>169017
whats your point? my figures aren't incorrect, your argument is retarded.
yKlxTq
No.169022
>>169020
We are in no way 'just' 13 years behind china.
a5xobv
No.169024
>>169003
China opened its economy almost one and a half decade earlier. They focused on basics even earlier.
KxKdqA
No.169026
yKlxTq
No.169037
>>168970
>If an iq study were to be done then, the general inference would be poor results which are corroborated by poor pci.
Asian americans today still score better than white americans and black americans score lower even in transracial adoption studies. The black white iq gap in US being genetic is pretty much settled science. Also looking how underdeveloped and uncivilized subsaharan africa has been since historical times is another indication of lower racial iq.
IxPCbM
No.169038
>>169027
something else to consider is that china industrialised in an environment conducive to that exact goal. (90s neoliberalism, globalisation, everyone rushed to offshore to china). We're in an age where companies are trying to decouple from china yes, but we're simultaneously also growing against china. Combine this with trump being retarded on trade and favouring protectionism, its not a good time for developing nations.
yKlxTq
No.169039
IxPCbM
No.169044
>>169039
HDI is a better term, japan has less than half the per capita of the united states and if it was in the union it would be the poorest state by a large margin. But Japan has an higher HDI than USA.
and for your argument PPP is a better term since it prices in for costs and out per capita PPP is only half that of china.
yKlxTq
No.169046
>>169026
>made up chink data.
Thats world bank, chamar. And china is quite behind some of the other east asian countries. You will come up with all sorts of mental gymnastics to explain why east asia is among the richest regions while subsahara the poorest despite being the most resource rich.
0rHMNU
No.169067
>>168838(OP)
dumbocracy, commies, libbus, pakistan, china, islamists and bureaun!ggers
0rHMNU
No.169069
>>169067
india is one military coup away from the first world
KxKdqA
No.169089
0rHMNU
No.169096
>>169089
coup kr rhe hai chutiye civil war nhin, nukes ka control pm ke pass centralized hota he, chodi ko maar ke chura lenge parmanu basta uska
