/b/ - Random

1 rafale down due to "technical issue at high altitude". Idk if frenchies and/or GoI are lying about the actual cause of crash. There was some info yesterday which attributed the aircraft loss to a 'fratricide event' which is basically friendly fire. All info related to it has been scrubbed from internet. Share your thoughts anons. Also Dyaush/mod don't delete this thread. Not anti nashnul.

Jeets can buy all the nice equipment they want but cannot operate it. The sheet incompetency in the armed forces is laughable right now, especially in the air force. (by the way I am a nigger)s keep shooting their own shit, I recall they shot down their own helicopter as well at the start of operation sindoor. 1 Rafael for a few hundred no name terrorists.

>>165708

Yes IAF shot down a MIL 19 helicopter in 2019. 5 people IAF personnel killed. Why can't India make a proper friend/for detection system? If DRDO Cant make buy it from somewhere. Literally even subhuman pakis dont shoot down their own aircraft.

>>165710

Friend/for*

67 gazillion replies thread in making

>>165713

Naah, gayush will nuke the thread if it crosses even 10 replies

>>165708

>>165710

Saar PAF is so much batter saar. Doesnt matter saar that they were still hit in paki heartland and lost 11 airbases and couldnt hit any target in india. Pakis are so good saar. Doesnt matter that they were doing jets downed dick measuring contest even in last days of 71 war and even abandoned their soldiers in kargil war calling them local rebels. They have such a track record of honesty saar. They surely must not be hiding losses on their side.

>>165717

Yup, anything even slightly negative about IAF/DRDO and he gets very worked up.

>>165723

Nobody denied Pak bases got hit saar. But IAF/ GOI is continuously shifting goal posts.

1. Just after OP sindhoor- No aircraft lost saar!

2. After few days- losses are part of combat saar!

3. Then CDS Anil Chauhan confirms aircraft losses to a journalist in Singapore. Not even directly to Indian people.

4. Now Dassault CEO confirms 1 rafale down.

Idc about pak but this is not a good look. Either accept losses publically or dont lose aircraft at all.

>>165730

>Either accept losses publically or dont lose aircraft at all.

Or don't let it out at alll. But can't even do that

>>165731

Hard to deny when there is photographic evidence of downed aircraft. Dehatis in bathinda put it all over the internet before IAF reached the site.

>>165730

Good. When the enemy is hiding the truth, no need to leak it for subhuman chomus who make blackpill threads

>>165739

Whatever helps you sleep.

>>165742

It's true tho retardu if pakistan was honest abt it's loses I would hv no problems goi revealing it.

>>165749

Then fucking keep it secret no? But no, the retards pajeet CDS Anil chauhan goes to Singapore and literally says " uh..... We lost some aircraft, but we rectified our mistakes" in an interview to a gookina journalist.

>>165703(OP)

ye sub chodi ki galti he uske tatte bohot chote hein war krne ke liye

>>165743

If a basically new aircraft costing 200+ million dollars per unit has "technical issues" and crashes during combat fighting chink planes, it's RafalOVER.

>>165764

nah thats a cover up, the engine wouldnt have separated from the airframe if it was a technical issue

>>165769

Technical issues can mean a lot of things. We can't assume

>>165761

Army shouldnt be secretive in a democratic country like ours. They can delay sharing the info with public but ultimately they are supposed to share it sooner or later to maintain public trust, credibility and transparency. No one takes paki claims seriously precisely due to their lies and deceits.

>>165769

True. Off course neither Dassault or the India will accept that rafale was shot down by AA chink. But everybody knows. See picrel. Peru rejected the rafale a few days ago. They bought the gripen. I don't know why India bought the dogshit rafale again for Indian navy

why are you so habby or you want it to be true so badly?

>>165793

strategic silence pyaare

>>165795

there's no other option

>>165796

muslim he ye

>>165799

iski maa ka rape karna padega

>>165799

Shitting on Dassault and the rafale makes one muslim? You learn something new everyday >>165797

Is it? Tell that to the CDS and Dassault CEO.

>>165804

dheere dheere baat nikalni toh pdegi hi warna cia-moled opposition dictatorship ro ro ke flood macha degi

>>165807

Yaar election toh woh nahi jeetenge, kya ukhad lenge?

>>165808

galti se jeetgye toh desh sidhe amrika ki luli pe jaega

Enough with the fucking pakistanis on this board

>>1422

>>165739

>subhuman chomus who make blackpill threads

Ironic typing this after statements are out that 200 million usd jet fell down to technical issues

>>165807

>cia-moled opposition

>he doesn't know modi is the cia shill

>>165859

If modi is cia glowie why did they Bangalore him after 2002 riots?

>>165870

Ban*

>>165804

madharchod katue ke bachhe

>>165870

Because they are the single most spotlight country in world politics

>>165703(OP)

I have some insider knowledge. But I cannot say anything, for obvious reasons. I wonder if anyone else here knows what I know.

>>165899

Just say whether it's good for our country or bad and whether modi ought to be spanked or not

>>165899

If it's embarrassing for India, don't say anything.

>>165904

Of course I won’t.

>>165899

atleast 3 plane down hue hain na pajeet dobhal???

>>165908

I can’t say anything.

>>165911

Any chance your insider info will be revealed in future in a report or something?

>>165914

I hope it won’t.

>>165911

give a hint lundia is jada chudi padi he hai ua porkystan ki, cia ne saari opposition aur judiciary kharid li hai na saar?

>>165916

from osint picture of crash debris i can confirm 3 were downed

>>165919

One in bhatinda and 2 in kashmir right?

>>165919

Also saar any info on pak aircraft losses? I've been searching but couldn't find anything in OSINT channels.

>>165921

yea

>>165922

pajeet media claimed 9 were destroyed in airstrikes on pakistani airfields, no solid proof for that shit tho, pakistan fares better in limited wars cuz of western tech and pajeet poolitician's intrinsic cowardice and reluctance to escalate

>>165928

All this could have been avoided if they chose to do SEAD. But no, we try to become vishwaguru

>>165929

yaar chodi is trying to focus on ekanamy at the cost of hard power, agniveer is another proof of his gandigiri, indira might have been a socialist but atleast we didnt refrain from using violence id honestly rather see her in power today than chodi, idk why people hate her emergency, the way she crushed khalistanis, the way she humiliated cia she's the best pajeeta girl to ever exist

>>165929

koi twitter bhangi bol rha tha ki chodi ne pehle hi phone kr ke bata diya tha pakistaniyon ko ki vo terrorist thokenge, any chance this is true?

>>165931

That is true, but necessary while striking a nuclear power like Pakistan. If they misinterpret indias missile as a nuclear strike and launch retaliatory nuclear strikes, all hell breaks lose. You can't hate modi for that though. Escalating against Pakistan is like playing Russian roulette. You don't know what happens next.

>>165940

Only a retard would think that we should go all out on a fellow nuclear power. Call me an anti-natl. But that is not a risk one should take.

>>165940

jab unke airfields pe brahmos mar rhe the tab chupke se nuclear warheads bhi maar dete