Recent Posts
yaar Heendu tera world class gurukul kahaan hai ?
Caste kangers idhar aana tumhara sariya karu
!a5ZupgZvPMa7DIY
GXTTWa
No.8221
Mauritius a country with over 50% Hindus comprising mainly of Kurmi, ahirs, and koeri look 1000 times better than country where birth born brilliant and brave dwijas lives. Even shudras like kurmi and ahirs built a better country than you piss drinkers.
Now piss off and stop kanging you absolute bottom of barrel losers.
!a5ZupgZvPMa7DIY
GXTTWa
No.8222
>>8221(OP)
gEExJG
No.8223
>>8221(OP)
Everyone shines outside India says a lot about the system here.
!a5ZupgZvPMa7DIY
GXTTWa
No.8225
>>8223
That's what I'm saying since eternity but loser (indian) kangers chimp out a lot. (indian) system is the biggest roadblock for india
eUcPy7
No.8226
>>8221(OP)
Small countries are very easy to govern, much easier so than larger ones.
India is facing
> 30 crore muzzies
> 30-40 crore SC/ST/OBC+LC that want freebies
starting completey fresh in a isolated place like Australia, Mauritius, Canada is much , much easier than wrangling retards and making it work (without mass genocide)
And also, if your Kurmi Ahirs and Koeri can manage in Mauritius, why do they need Reservations in India?
Truth is UC are just much smarter geneticall and competitive than LC so much so that without reservations these same (indian)s would not be represented at all.
XtkVhy
No.8227
>>8221(OP)
You cannot converse with (indian) kangers. They have nothing worth being proud of , so they use birth benefits, none that they earned.
We still are lesser children of greater men. We owe a lot to the Hindu Mahasabha.
XtkVhy
No.8228
>>8226
> starting completey fresh in a isolated place like Australia, Mauritius, Canada is much , much easier than wrangling retards and making it work (without mass genocide)
Truth
eUcPy7
No.8229
>>8227
Càste isn't something you can kang about. It's not something you choose. It's ascribed by others to you.
The fact that even LC Indians can make a great country just means Reservations 1. aren't needed and 2. Muslims are a bigger issue than LC (which is white pilling for Lundia).
XtkVhy
No.8230
>>8229
Qualities are cultivated and earned. They are provided as much by genetic random lottery, as by choices and how someone is raised.
(indian) is earned.
That we use terms assigned to us by British surveyors in 1921 , with any level of seriousness today, is a massive joke.
> (indian) isn't something you can kang about
!a5ZupgZvPMa7DIY
GXTTWa
No.8232
>>8226
>Truth is UC are just much smarter geneticall and competitive than LC
If they were so smart and strong genetically why did they lost to Mughals and British? Why do they have to align with the invaders?
Oh leave that your small pp brain isn't capable of such higher consciousness you just tell me even after the British left why don't your muh "genitacally smart" people seized the power and build a beautiful country??
!a5ZupgZvPMa7DIY
GXTTWa
No.8233
>>8226
>if your Kurmi Ahirs and Koeri can manage in Mauritius, why do they need Reservations in India?
Because traitor dwijas aligned with mughals and British and hoard all the resources for themselves while a so called UC person can prepare for exams till 30 years of age without have to worry about finances of family, your average LC have to work just after turning 18 while also focusing on exams. That is the reason UC has more chances of getting the position of power than an LC (not to mention UC indulgence in mass scale corruption, nepotism and connection building)
XtkVhy
No.8234
>>8232
Why this image?
rSNJlA
No.8235
>SAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR
Naali saaf kar bhangi
rSNJlA
No.8237
>>8236
Kaam pe lag, naali isnt gonna clean itself
!a5ZupgZvPMa7DIY
GXTTWa
No.8238
>>8237
>Bengali
Weakest ethnicity in the world. Sonagachi me tumhari maa ka dhanda kaisa chal Raha hai?
rSNJlA
No.8239
>>8238
back to work, naali bula rahi tujhe
xfoQ8g
No.8240
Most freedom fighters were UCs, unlike deletes and LCs who were bootlicking brits, UCs were killing them
> Freedom fighters executed by the British came from diverse backgrounds, but a significant number of recorded revolutionaries, especially in early 20th-century urban anti-colonial movements, belonged to the Brahmin community. They were often highly educated and politically active in the, and thus formed a large part of the revolutionary leadership.
Last prominent freedom fighter executed was also a Bhadraloka (Bengali UCs)
> Surya Sen, the leader of the 1930 Chittagong armoury raid, is considered one of the last prominent Indian freedom fighters executed by the British, hanged on January 12, 1934, in Chittagong jail
First one to be executed was Bhumihar
> Maharaja Nandakumar is often considered the first to be executed by hanging (1775) under British rule for alleged forgery
xfoQ8g
No.8241
>>8240
Many top of killers of brits were UCs
Madan lal dhingra (Khatri)
Chandrashekhar azad (Brahmin)
Chapekar brothers (brahmin)
Anant Laxman Kanhere (brahmin)
Ram Behari Bose (Kayatha)
Sukhdev (Khatri)
Rajguru (Brahmin)
xfoQ8g
No.8242
>>8241
Deletes who kang on fictional battle of Bhima koregaon should be last one to talk about betrayal
You can manipulate the present sources but the history written pre 1950s never lie
xfoQ8g
No.8243
Chamars who kang on indian left shall know that it was established by UCs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindustan_Socialist_Republican_Association#
eUcPy7
No.8246
>>8232
You win some and you lose some
Mughals themselves lost and so did the British , both of these groups lost way harder than Indian Hindus ever did btw.
British is basically a mixed mutt island , consisting of every invader wave coming every 200-400 years in the past 2000 years
Every time a new wave came to Britain they completely lost their old identity. English isn't even the original language of England for example.
And Mughals were also very short lived. Most of these groups simply were in the ruling place because they used violence. Not because they were smarter better more beauitful.
Anyway this has nothing to do with (indian) system really - remember UC are not oppressors of Lower (indian)s. Lower (indian)s WILLINGLY participate and choose to be part of the society created by UC.
LC want access to universities where UC teach. LC want access to UC women. etc.
The reverse isn't true.
In the end everybody should strive to be the best he can be in this life with whatever talents he has.
But being delusional won't help you at all.
XtkVhy
No.8247
>>8246
>>8242
>>8240
Betrayal to the Indian (indian) was not (indian) based. Most importantly, the current (indian) definitions are a British imposition, not proper Jati-Varna definitions.
The main issue is , taking these labels seriously at all. Worst still, GOI discriminating us based on British labels.
XtkVhy
No.8248
>>8221(OP)
To OP.
It is true that founding labourers in Mauritius were LC's. They were part of the farmers and millitia , mainly but not limited to Hindi heartland, who took part in 1857 rebellion or had rebellious tendencies, or related to prominent rebels.
(indian) kanging has reached Mauritius too btw. The prime minister is usually vaishnav and Hindu. There is dissatisfaction with this too. Naveen Ramgoolam is old enough, this will be his last term. His one illegitimate daughter is not in politics and the other party is like the Congress of India.
Personally I find this debate pointless. I only want (indian) agnostic laws with benefits for economically weaker sections.
eUcPy7
No.8249
>>8247
British correctly identified different strength and weaknesses of different indian groups.
Even though they didn't understand the varna/jati system.
They did so mostly to exploit India better and more efficiently so their reasoning for labelling was a different one.
LC kanging and going full Buddhist or hating on brechmins is just stupid anyhow.
Brechmins have nothing to do with the majority of LC being useless when left to their own.
XtkVhy
No.8375
>>8249
They poisoned pill Indian society. The sikh fragmentation had its seeds laid in 1920s.
Its true that British introduced some organization that was better than Mughal loot. But something like maratha rule would have been better
qWNCZr
No.8384
>>8221(OP)
Mauritius is a tax haven and has no military whatsoever.
Luxembourg is richer than US but we all know which of the two matters more.
Taiwan is richer than china but we all know which of the two matters more.
qWNCZr
No.8385
>>8232
>If they were so smart and strong genetically why did they lost to Mughals and British?
<UCs lost to mughals and brits.
<LCs lost to UCs.
What does it say about LCs?
!a5ZupgZvPMa7DIY
GXTTWa
No.8406
>>8385
It says whites>mughals>UC>LC
And if you are happy being just above the rock bottom and have to kang all day long, then dude lord save you.
8OYnNa
No.8408
>>8406
2 are pure invaders - british and Mughals
UC are civilization builders who united this entire continent , made religion , philosophy, science, medicine, yoga and everything. Everything that we know about indian history is due to Brahmins recording it.
Any science math philosophy etc u see about indian subcontinent is due to them
British and Mughals simply invaded already built civilization and ruled over it
eUcPy7
No.8411
>>8408
Not only that but also remember Whites and Mughals constantly lost their identities to invaders while UC never did.
LC have no identity of their own they are completely inept/incompetent so much that they have to deify a guy who started worshipping an UC (Buddha) out of resentment for being placed lowly in the jati/varna system.
!a5ZupgZvPMa7DIY
GXTTWa
No.8412
>>8384
When will this UC cope stop when you lose on facts you start goal sifting, Mauritius is beautiful, Luxembourg is beautiful, USA is beautiful, Taiwan is beautiful, china is beautiful. Now you think which country is not beautiful? It's the country which was ruled majority of time by muh Dwijas muh UCs.
You first have to do your basics right because people look at you first your first impression. majority people are not nerds they make opinion on the first impression not like oh your country look unorganised and dirty but let me check global firepower index, oh anon, you rank 3rd on GFI let me respect you.
India despite being strong militarily doesn't have same respect as a taiwanese Chinese Luxembourg or USA person accept the fact.
rSNJlA
No.8413
>>8412
Tu fir aagaya, shift kab shuru hai teri bhangi
4VBG7K
No.8414
>>8408
Don't forget kshatriyas
You may hate rajasthani rajputs all you want but its the fact that they never let muslims affect the life of average rajasthani hindu, they may fight for mughals in foreign land (outside rajasthan) but they also ensured that hindus (and jains too) in rajasthan live peacefully
You may find a lot of old hindu & jain temples in rajasthan
Unlike other regions prone to invasions, only rajasthan was able to retain the native culture
Nairs in kerala also did a great job, till 1947 Travancore's state religion was hinduism
Small kingdom of kerala was doing much better in art & science compared to islamic india
!a5ZupgZvPMa7DIY
GXTTWa
No.8415
>>8408
>British and Mughals simply invaded already built civilization and ruled over it
Again the point still stands >>8385
>>If they were so smart and strong genetically why did they lost to Mughals and British?
What's the point of civilization religion building when you lost to what you call "maleccha"
Also what civilization building what wisdom did you achieved when you have to declare people who cleans(the important work) as untouchables?
>>8411
>UC never lost identity
That's why you beg in front of same whites who enslaved you both in India and abroad saar gib me job saar gib me h1b please you claim to build all science and sheeit then where is your LLM, your AGI, your original space missions?
eUcPy7
No.8416
>>8412
When will you stop coping about the fact that UC are the only thing keeping people like you afloat and your community simply can't compete?
Only LC like you have issues with (indian). Parsis have 0 issue succeeding in India. Jains have 0 issue succeeding in India. Funny how you never hear them asking for freebies or quotas.
Only your kind seemingly need endless quotas, freebies, schemes etc. and even then you can't manage to be competitive.
And Mauritius isn't that beautiful btw, its just small and therefore easy to manage.
Leaders of Mauritius don't want to be associated with Dalits/LC of India. In fact they view themselves as Vaishya.
Where UC adapt and succeed LC/dalits like you fail and cry.
UC created Indian civilization
UC got subjugated by Muslims -> they adapted and survived
UC got subjugated by British -> they adapted and in less than 200 years became Prime Minister of Britain
LC/dalits aren't even in the picture here, they can't manage to navigate any system and most of all not a competitive one.
!a5ZupgZvPMa7DIY
GXTTWa
No.8417
>>8414
>only rajasthan was able to retain the native culture
Yaar Raju ab tumhara kya hi bolu you were able to save yourselves because when asked to kneel, you prostrated. You have away your daughters like an object of negotiations including royal wealth collected from poor peasants. Honour is a great thing but since you are a raju you won't understand.
eUcPy7
No.8418
!a5ZupgZvPMa7DIY
GXTTWa
No.8420
>>8416
>Mauritius don't want to be associated with Dalits/LC of India. In fact they view themselves as Vaishya.
Majority of them are Kurmis(my càste), vaisya according to modern càste kangers definition are dalits
>>8416
>UC got subjugated by Muslims -> they adapted and survived
>UC got subjugated by British -> they adapted and in less than 200 years became Prime Minister of Britain
Kekkkk adopted? Kekkkk being a sissy cuck is called adopting?? Giving away your daughters like a war booty seeing them change your daughters religion in front of them is adopting working as a subordinate to them on their mercy and on their pension is not adopting but a humiliation. Again honour is a great virtue,and since you are a kangz you won't get it leave it I won't even force you to understand.
Anyways thank for accepting the fact that you have no honour from now on your kanging has no basis
O1sEXO
No.8421
>>8417
> Saar they gave dotter saar, my source is bollywood saar
Only two houses had martial relations with mughals, rest didn't, the princess later became empress of india
What about the lowerc@ste women who were subjugated to worse things, where is the honor
And where i am wrong, rajasthanis retained the culture
I am a non rajput saying this
Under Akbar's rule, Mughals lost only two battles
One was battle of Dewair (Maharana pratap vs mughals) and other was malandari pass (Mughals vs pashtuns)
It was another Rajput general(Jai singh) who later fought and defeated the both the pratap and pashtuns
Politics of that time was complex, you can't view it from hindu-muslim lens
eUcPy7
No.8422
>>8420
(jai bhim) isn't even in the historical picture execpt as slaves.
I can understand that must feel very humiliating.
You were basically deemed as good enough to be farm equipment by Britishers and that's that.
And yes, you kept using and still use an identity created by UC - not your own.
The word Kurmi itself comes from Sanskrit.
Start by coming up with your own language, scripture and class designation. My people have created it all and mastered others as well.
itujnz
No.8423
>>8415
So what? Everyone took some Ls in history. Its a part of existence on earth. Egypt speaks arabic today, persia follows islam today, chinks lost to mongols. The real question is who managed to survive and retain their civilisation.
!a5ZupgZvPMa7DIY
GXTTWa
No.8425
>>8418
Question- you gave away your daughters to save your ass?
Answer- Yes!!!
Enough said. No debates left now.
Kek he even goes on to kang on cuckoldry that saar look my women so beautiful saar that even goblins want them saar because they are better than me saar so i seek their validation saar since I'm sissy cuck for their viraltiy saar.
Yaar cuck anon
>>8421
>Only two
>later became empress of india
Yaar I wasn't wrong you fags are such cucks that you openly accept it. She later became empress but not as a rajputni but as a converted Muslim who was gave away as a war booty who's men had no honour. Yaar imagine being suck a cuck I'm still in shock that men of this country has stoop to such level just to kang
>>8421
>rajasthanis retained the culture
>I am a non rajput saying this
Sure you do because 'इस हमाम में तो तुम सब नंगे हो'
Again they retained because 'when asked to kneel, they prostrated'. Zero honour.
eUcPy7
No.8426
>>8425
> dotters!!
Do you realize your DNA is so bad nobody wanted to mix with you eonugh so that you could remain a seperate community? Imagine your women being so ugly that nobody even considers ràping them.
Being LC/dalit must be traumatizing experience kek
1TrRz7
No.8427
>>8423
There were multiple traditions where LCs or Dalit women were forced to bed with UCs or muslim men
Even today there are several dalit groups in central india who sell their daughters
But i am not a subhuman who will use it an argument
Whenever dalits/LCs are show their place, their only argument is saar brits ruled you saar, saar mughals defeated you saar, saar your dotter saar, saar whites are rich saar
They have nothing to be proud of hence they try to drag you down tooo
itujnz
No.8428
>>8415
>people who cleans(the important work) as untouchables?
Brahmins didnt make them untouchables. Their occupation and all other cástes did. All cástes even shudras were complicit. You are free to touch a gutter cleaning bhangi as much as you want. Lol. Let others decide for themselves. And historically, leather tanners (chamars) were always kept out of village everywhere even in europe due to stink and sandaas cleaning gongfarmers were treated as outcástes.
eUcPy7
No.8429
>>8428
He might not even be Indian
!a5ZupgZvPMa7DIY
GXTTWa
No.8430
>>8427
You are equating commoners with the kings of that time, I know you are low iq but giving away your daughters like a war booty just to save your ass is a sign of ultimate subhumanity and openly seeing your women getting converted to such ugly religion is embarrassing losing is not bad but losing your hounor is losing everything, but losing everything is also not as bad as openly kanging about being a cuck.
Even the sissy whitebois who stick qos tattoo on their body with chastity cage and plapping their balls with black dildo while watching bnwo porn is not a subhuman like a level you and that Swiss anon has gotten to the Swiss anon is openly saying that goblin subhuman muslim raped my women so I'm better than you.
O1sEXO
No.8432
>>8430
Elites marry whoever they wants
Rana sangha married the sister of his muslim commanders
Mother in law of Peshwa bajirao was daughter of hyderabadi Nizam
Jai singh married Akbar's niece
Muslims were powerful that time hence they just had upperhand
!a5ZupgZvPMa7DIY
GXTTWa
No.8433
>>8426
>Imagine your women being so ugly that nobody even considers ràping them.
Listen UC cuck I know you don't represent all the UCs but you are definitely the most disgusting cuck I ever communicated in my life.
Coming on your point I don't seek validation from muslims or even whites that If they approve my women to be rapeable then only I will consider myself beautiful, this level of subhumanity is only attained by few lucky filthy pigs like you.
And this a last instance I'm replying to you I don't interact with such filthy animals who don't even respect their own women also I'm very sure you never experienced women touch.
eUcPy7
No.8434
>>8432
Nobody ever wants to marry their dotter to LC/dalit tho.
In fact the Jati of Siddhartha Buddha was wiped out because another Jati trying to marry a LC/Dalit woman off as a UC.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vi%E1%B8%8D%C5%AB%E1%B8%8Dabha
Most violence that occurs due to (indian) happens in between LC/dalits, not from UC/GC -> LC.
eUcPy7
No.8435
>>8433
I doubt you are even Indian. So nice LARP.
XtkVhy
No.8448
>>8434
Used to be. Now if you are rich, (jai bhim) hardly matters. My rich LC friend got a nice UC wife. Happily married.
Historically too, richest families were LC's.
XtkVhy
No.8449
>>8428
This was done by Turks, not UC's. A lot of anti UC literature is written by Missionaries and full of lies. The moment this is mentioned, they accuse you of being (indian)ist.
/6XKyy
No.8450
>>8448
Why you people fetishize UC women
XtkVhy
No.8451
>>8384
QOL is better in Luxemborg. You don't really know what you are talking about at all.
XtkVhy
No.8452
>>8412
US is pretty ugly to live in. Not to mention high crime, very high inflation and political instability.
yCyhiR
No.8453
>bhangibait
<Gets sariya'ed and baited in his own thread
XtkVhy
No.8528
>>8450
I am LC married to LC. No fetish involved.
vOatXf
No.8609
>>8237
Yesssss Daddyyyyy I am LC I will follow your orders
