Recent Posts
vVdS8x
No.96840
Why are so many young women walking around with shirts that expose their bare stomachs?
Do their fathers encourage to such behavior?
shPkbX
No.96847
>>96840(OP)
why do you have a problem n1gg3r? do you want them to become penguin? i don't have a problem to see em wearing this. in fact it kinda makes me happy when a beautiful women sits right besides me and talk to me. i'd never let them wear those old fashioned clothes. you hear that?
vVdS8x
No.96851
>>96840(OP)
I see some pre-teens walking around looking like fucking whores with their FATHERS. I can understand the mothers, since they are retarded to let their daughter dress like that in public, but a FATHER?? What the FUCK are you thinking?
D4KWEL
No.96863
>>96848
you should read your picrel again till you find your answer. we cant help low comprehension plebbitbhangis
ZpE9Qn
No.96868
>>96840(OP)
I'm disappointed they don't show more. They should expose more. Women should walk out like this.
vVdS8x
No.96879
3vC5rQ
No.96885
test
3vC5rQ
No.96889
>>96840(OP)
what's so funny to me is that that style of clothing is supposed to show off your abs and most indian women have shitty skinny fat genetics so most of the time they're pulling their pants up constantly to hide their disgusting flabby bellies, why even wear it at all?
ZpE9Qn
No.96904
>>96879
And they would fuck me if they wore burqa? At least this way I get to enjoy watching hotties .
Man faggotry is truly incurable.
ZpE9Qn
No.96905
>>96889
This. We don't judge, just pull the pants down and expose your flabby belly randi.
vVdS8x
No.96914
>>96904
This is the type of person who will let his gf (if he can even get one) go on a solo trip to goa for "business"
ZpE9Qn
No.96923
>>96914
Imagine having a gf in the year of our Lord 2082, can't be me.
0hElLU
No.96942
>>96840(OP)
Fuck off muzzie niggger. It's normal to show navel in saree.
vVdS8x
No.96949
>>96942
That was after bullawood normalized women wearing saris like a crop top.
0hElLU
No.96955
>>96949
Before muzzies, women didn't even wear blouses. We are a tropical country that'll become hotter with global warming. This muzzie retardation has to go.
ZpE9Qn
No.96959
>>96949
As they should. It makes no sense to drape a saree over a blouse.
ZpE9Qn
No.96963
>>96955
Iirc, blouse became popular after some bhangali women were denied entry in to the brit clubs for exposing shoulders in saree. Before that most lundian women didn't wear a blouse with saree and just draped it over the whole body.
vVdS8x
No.96973
>>96955
Take your (you)
IUq0r+
No.96975
>>96840(OP)
yea bruv expose your breats if you wanna dont show your uggo tummy
IUq0r+
No.96976
>>96975
*breasts
0hElLU
No.96985
>>96975
The less modest clothes get, the more women will began to physically exercize and put an effort into being hot.
3vC5rQ
No.96999
>>96985
the average american woman weighs 170lbs, they will show you their filthy disgusting bodies and you can't do anything about it.
0hElLU
No.97004
>>96999
>american
That's because their food is absolute slop and car dependent infrastructure. See europe.
0hElLU
No.97005
>>96999
Also mirin those digits
6fmTq3
No.97009
NOrhJn
No.97011
>>96985
This,there is a reason avg muzzroach randis in middle east are so fucking fat like a fucking land whale simply because they literally don't even need to expose their skin let alone their figures
0hElLU
No.97015
>>97009
>misses the point
It's hard to be fit in America. If you are poor you'll only have access to the slop. A more reasonable comparision is Europe.
SPwuGS
No.97037
>>96955
Kuch bhi bakchodi kralo in raito se
XiTf8f
No.97041
>>96847
>do you want them to become penguin?
Hurr durr You dont want me to live like i want to so you want me to die?
Foid brain
>>96863
There are some standards of decency that everyone ought to follow in public. I as a man cant just walk into a supermarket shirtless even in the US and can get jailed for walking out completely naked. Society has the right to stop or shame you if your actions make others uncomfortable. Women wearing revealing clothes are violating the right of others to not be 'disturbed' or made 'uncomfortable' in their public life.
0hElLU
No.97044
>>97041
>I as a man cant just walk into a supermarket shirtless
In some tropical countries, and tourist regions like florida and thailand, you can.
0hElLU
No.97045
>>97041
Modesty as a concept doesn't make sense for tropical countries. It's retarded.
XiTf8f
No.97050
>>97044
>In some
vVdS8x
No.97051
>>97037
Lul.
>it is due to global warming bro
No man walks around with crop top exposing his bare stomach.
0hElLU
No.97056
vVdS8x
No.97061
>>97051
By the way it's literally raining in the month of May.
ZpE9Qn
No.97063
>>97051
Most unkils here walk topless in and around their houses.
0hElLU
No.97064
>>97051
Men can go shirtless. If men being shirtless was normalised, more men would put effort into their physique.
!lmOJk15ILR6OW/a
Lnx8Us
No.97065
ZpE9Qn
No.97066
>>97061
Summer rains increases the humidity making the heat actually worse.
!lmOJk15ILR6OW/a
Lnx8Us
No.97068
XiTf8f
No.97069
>>97045
North india isnt tropical and i dont care what some ooga boogas do in their jungles. Even in tropics people arent roaming naked. Fucking amazonian tribes demand clothes from missionaries and donors. Loose airy cotton clothes are useful in tropics.
0hElLU
No.97072
XiTf8f
No.97073
>>97056
Abe pajeet. There are literally stores in US where you cant even enter if shirtless.
0hElLU
No.97075
>>97073
USA is not a tropical country retard. Also it's puritan and very muzzie like, when compared to Europe.
bEp3Ch
No.97076
>>96942
Kek Anon I...
ZpE9Qn
No.97077
>>97041
>completely naked
They're not walking naked though
> I as a man
You can in most places, especially in lundia.
>Society has the right to stop or shame you if your actions make others uncomfortable.
Once again faggotry is incurable kek
0hElLU
No.97079
vVdS8x
No.97081
ZpE9Qn
No.97083
>>97073
That's private firm chamar. They can enforce whatever rules they want doesn't mean it's applicable to public spaces.
XiTf8f
No.97084
>>97072
You didnt say that but i said what i had to say anyway just like noone said anything about tropics but you had to bring them up.
bEp3Ch
No.97085
>>96955
This is famous psyop among women on whether blouses are a part of our culture or not. For (you) suprise this is the biggest lie of Marxist historians just like sati practice and holocaust.
ZpE9Qn
No.97086
>>97081
>They wear banyans
Not every place is the same
>was no heat this year in the first place,
Lol
Lmao even
0hElLU
No.97092
>>97085
>Marxist historians
Yaar pajeet, you really think Jews give a fuck about making psyops for us?
XiTf8f
No.97094
>>97083
Pajeet do u even fuckin know what this thread is about? We arent talking about legality here. We are talking about societal standards. In india too girls can roam around in revealing clothings. Its legal but socially unacceptable.
ZpE9Qn
No.97096
>>97085
It's historically attested that most regions in India didn't wear a blouse for most of history. It doesn't even make sense functionally, why would you cover your top and then on top of it drape a saree over top of it?
0hElLU
No.97099
>>97096
It's even mentioned in our literature, for example the unraveling of draupadis saree.
ZpE9Qn
No.97101
>>97094
Chamar, do you know what I'm talking about? Are you seriously bringing up muttland to justify your retarded position where underaged randis walk in literal underwear? God I hate when chamars like you who can't even get any better defence then muh mutts/yuros do it.
!lmOJk15ILR6OW/a
Lnx8Us
No.97102
>>97099
She can still wear saree with both booba out you know.
bEp3Ch
No.97104
>>97092
Lmao anon you don't know but the biggest enemy after whites are us people for kikes. These kikes have poisoned your food too forget about culture and government. (You) all foget about the funding of atheism in Nepal? Kek! These kikes are now have whole fledged cities and markets in UK and HP. No wonder you will hear something bad from these areas after some decades. Like women of pahadi areas or drug culture or first gay and fetish club in Shimla.
SPwuGS
No.97108
>>97051
Kon
bEp3Ch
No.97109
>>97101
Kek even most of girls in muttland don't wear revealing clothes. He got psyoped hard.
SPwuGS
No.97110
>>97104
Tell more
XiTf8f
No.97112
>>97075
>USA is not a tropical country retard.
So? Are we fucking basing our morals on geography now? Then north india too can have the excuse of not being tropical.
>Also it's puritan and very muzzie like, when compared to Europe.
Thats just an excuse. Ofc i as a non westerner know less about sensibilities of european culture than that of US because US is more well known due to its global soft power. So you can always bring up europe and i wont be able to comment on that bcz i know nothing about non anglo cultures.
vVdS8x
No.97113
>>97094
I get it now, their sisters dress like sluts and they are trying to justify it somehow (global warming bro kek). Sadly, there is no amount of copium that can make you feel ok about your daughter/sister/wife being a slut.
0hElLU
No.97115
>>97104
Get off /pol/.
0hElLU
No.97117
>>97113
Might as well get burqa for your daughte/sister/wife so that she can be trad.
ZpE9Qn
No.97124
>>97109
Assuming you're right(which isn't, just go to a beach lol) but anyways, and?
Why can't chamarz like you justify your retarded position for its own merit instead of this monkey see monkey do logic?
3WoAkI
No.97127
>>97104
Fuck off to 4cuck you cucked out white cum guzzling chamaar you live under rock or something?4chan is back just fuck off
vVdS8x
No.97132
>>97117
Whatever helps you sleep at night.
XiTf8f
No.97133
>>97101
Its a slippery slope. Pajeetas will keep cutting down the inches of crop top if you dont stop them. US didnt become degenerate overnight.
0hElLU
No.97139
XiTf8f
No.97144
>>97117
Might as well let your daughter/sister go topless so she feels more liberated.
ZpE9Qn
No.97159
0hElLU
No.97162
XiTf8f
No.97171
>>97159
>And this is bad why?
Because not everyone is a 24/7 porn brained coomer like you. You dont want to feel 'uncomfortable' when you are just out with friends and family and have no desire to be exposed to sexually provocative stuff.
bEp3Ch
No.97175
>>97096
Post proof chamar where it's written. I have said earlier this is the biggest meme you all believed in like sati practice.
0hElLU
No.97179
>>97165
Muzzies are unironically more porn brained coomers because their women are covered 24/7. So they literally have shoulder fetish, neck fetish and shit like that.
ZpE9Qn
No.97187
0hElLU
No.97192
>>97187
It's even obviously implied, in the attempted unraveling of draupadi's saree,
bEp3Ch
No.97195
>>97115
>>97110
>>97124
>>97127
I'll stand by my saying. No women in any part of the world before WW2 used to wear revealing clothes. In those times, men of families don't even have to tell their women on what type of clothes you have to wear because older women used to thot patrol younger chicks. Only some photographs of rats eating tribes used by Marxist historians to psyop you into believing that blouse is not the part of our culture and that famous breast tax thing in dumeel areas.
XiTf8f
No.97199
>>97175
He has no proof. I remember him yapping about this stuff long ago in some thread. I told him 'choli' was worn with ghagra by indian women. Choli is blouse. He then made the claim that somehow only Northwest india had choli and rest of india was blouseless.
0hElLU
No.97201
>>97195
Go the fuck back to /pol/ you cum-guzzling cockroach.
M2nKAe
No.97202
ZpE9Qn
No.97206
>>97195
Arey chamar who said revealing clothes? I said they didn't wear blouse. They just draped the saree whole over their body. And here you're saying that was jewish psyop? Lmao.
bEp3Ch
No.97207
Also for white race, white men are brainwashed hard and have to act as liberal infront of their sisters otherwise they are also capable of teaching their sisters and daughters on what's degeneracy. That's true that sisters and daughters are literally coomfuel in west.
vVdS8x
No.97208
>>97187
This is literally some libtard trying to justify cutting dicks off to become a woman because in Hindu mythology, several deities are depicted with gender transitions.
XiTf8f
No.97210
vVdS8x
No.97212
ZpE9Qn
No.97216
0hElLU
No.97217
>>97207
What a buckbroken /pol/ schizo lmao.
0hElLU
No.97218
>>97210
Fair, but it occurs at higher rates.
XiTf8f
No.97222
>>97206
Even if some tribals wore that you fags project it onto whole of india. We had ghagra choli, churidar even before muzzies.
bEp3Ch
No.97223
>>97199
I'm trying to login in my old Opera account because it has bookmarks for trvukes for these coomer retards on history of clothes. They don't know the famous story of Spartans that they used to kill their own daughters and sister when they roam around naked in fields during playing games.
XiTf8f
No.97226
>>97218
Stats?
M2nKAe
No.97228
>>97216
>proof is one niche culture in Muslim dominated area in contrast to entire India l
>now this guy says it's not true
Yaar schizofaggot. Kys.
ZpE9Qn
No.97233
>>97222
> if some tribals wore that you fags project it onto whole of india
Exactly what you're doing lol.
Please provide evidence to the contrary that these were widespread clothing choices.
0hElLU
No.97235
>>97226
I don't have stats, but it seems logical. The reason why whites have a much higher rate of foot fetish is because they wear socks most of the time, so they don't see naked feet that often.
bEp3Ch
No.97240
>>97187
That screenshotrel he posted on Tootar is fake edited chamar. He's debunked in his own post in replies kek! You coomer brained.
0hElLU
No.97244
Anyways, no point arguing in this thread. It's not like anyone is going to change their opinions no matter what evidence either side presents.
bEp3Ch
No.97259
>>97244
Yeah! The OP of this thread got 100+ replies and dopamine, kek! Anyways in India it's just started we all will see soon naked girls roaming in streets of metro cities and totalen behaviour sink.
ZpE9Qn
No.97269
bEp3Ch
No.97270
>>97266
You'll die unmarried too chamar.
vVdS8x
No.97277
XiTf8f
No.97279
>>97233
Firstly idc because i am from Northwest and idc about studying every region just to make a point.
Secondly, the fact that men are hardwired to cover their women from unknown men and that blouses are worn in rest of india as well shows that it is likely an old practice.
Thirdly marathi women wore this.
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClassicDesiCool/comments/ztiemg/a_group_of_marathi_women_in_the_1870s/
ZpE9Qn
No.97282
>>97270
Fair, but unlike you I'll die without regretting about marrying a zoomer foid.
XiTf8f
No.97285
>>97235
Why do only whites have scat fetish and other most degenerate fetishes if they are less coomer brained?
840asg
No.97287
bEp3Ch
No.97291
>>97287
Bhimjeeta!
M2nKAe
No.97308
>>97233
>evidence
Search "uttariya", "stanpatta" doesn't directly talk but there terms such as "antariya" and "uttariya", antariya if for lower garment, and i don't need to explain the other. They are referenced in manusmriti, kamasutra, and natyasastra by bharat. All ranging ariund 200 bce
In draupadis disrobing it is implied that removal of her upper garment is utterly shameful, which aligns with modesty of breasts point.
In tamil sangam lit, something named "poranaru"or "akananaaru" i dont remmebr, mentioned terms like "netti" and "meladai" which means like upper clothe. This from 300 bce
Even in budhist text, vinaya patak, mentions "uttariya" as modesty code.
And for final, take this ajanta cave from 5th BCE .painting women wearing "uttariya". Obviously artists wants to draw naked women for no reason but here are these women with upper clothes implying some form of modesty.
Ab nikal ja yaha se randi ke pille
0hElLU
No.97309
>>97285
60% of all extreme fetish (by the way I am a nigger)s are usually german, for some reason. Aside from germans, whites aren't that disproportionately overrepresented
6fmTq3
No.97336
>>97309
>for some reason
germany also has disproportionate rates of autism
seems like they just drew a genetic short straw - or something in german culture encourages neurodivergence
XiTf8f
No.97343
>>97308
Kek. He has been silent.
ZpE9Qn
No.97345
>>97308
I asked for widespread adoption of blouse before, your just providing evidence that they covered their upper body which was never the argument.
0hElLU
No.97349
>>97336
It's unironically due to german fairytales being extremely fucked and violent. I have a certain degenerate fetish, and all the commuties related to the fetish are largely german. It's gotten to the point that I am geniunely considering learning german, because a lot of the erotica for that fetish is written in german.
ZpE9Qn
No.97356
>>97343
I've stopped responding a long time ago but I guess chamars can't even read and arguing against points I never even made lol.
>>97279
Your evidence is pics from 1870s
>>97308
Even in these pics you posted women aren't covering that much lol. They're showing more than the girls OP is seething about lol.
XiTf8f
No.97357
>>97308
Even ghoonghat is a native indian practice (north indian at the very least). Gupta era playwright Sudraka talks about mentions women wearing 'avagunthana' a veil. Raita wingers psyop propagates ghoonghat was a result of islamic invasions.
0hElLU
No.97364
Here is an example of a german fairytale:
One day, Mamma said, "Conrad dear,
I must go out and leave you here.
But mind now, Conrad, what I say,
Don't suck your thumb while I'm away.
The great tall tailor always comes
To little boys that suck their thumbs.
And ere they dream what he's about
He takes his great sharp scissors
And cuts their thumbs clean off, - and then
You know, they never grow again."
Mamma had scarcely turn'd her back,
The thumb was in, alack! alack!
The door flew open, in he ran,
The great, long, red-legged scissorman.
Oh! children, see! the tailor's come
And caught our little Suck-a-Thumb.
Snip! Snap! Snip! the scissors go;
And Conrad cries out - Oh! Oh! Oh!
Snip! Snap! Snip! They go so fast;
That both his thumbs are off at last.
Mamma comes home; there Conrad stands,
And looks quite sad, and shows his hands;-
"Ah!" said Mamma "I knew he'd come
To naughty little Suck-a-Thumb."
XiTf8f
No.97366
>>97356
>pics from 1870s.
They are marathi women away from bengal and why are they so wrapped up if its a recent practice due to victorian morals.
ZpE9Qn
No.97368
>>97357
Arey chamar, why can't you stop lying? No one ever made an argument that women didn't cover their top you illiterate chamar.
I asked evidence for saree over blouse being widespread because reasoned here >>97096(impracticality, wearing two clothes instead of one, etc...) and all evidence you chamars can give are women either wearing tops or women covering their chests.
My god, you chamars need to learn to read first.
XiTf8f
No.97381
>>97356
>Even in these pics you posted women aren't covering that much lol.
Shifting goalposts? They were clearly wearing blouses 2300 years ago as shown. Ofc humans in art are often depicted naked thats just what artists do. Many women in art are also concubines or celestial beings.
ZpE9Qn
No.97386
XiTf8f
No.97389
>>97096
>doesn't even make sense functionally, why would you cover your top and then on top of it drape a saree over top of it?
For the same reason women wear bras and men wear underwear underneath their clothes.
M2nKAe
No.97392
>>97356
>covering breast with no cleavage
>covering even shoulders in one
>posted women aren't covering that much lol
Just kys niqger. These are painting and paintings have always drawn people in sexy versions. Why would artists spend so much time drawing people in normal look. Chutiya. It simply solidifies that there were upper clothing to cover as norm and you should stfu now. There aren't much of our history saved either ways.
>>97345
There was widespread adoption of "uttariya". Why do specially want blouse, the point is covering retard.
840asg
No.97393
M2nKAe
No.97400
>>97368
>No one ever made an argument that women didn't cover their top
Aur goalpost shift kar le bhangi. That was literally the point of crying " waah no blouse brooo" for justifying randipana in this thread. Theres not much of pur history saved regardless to look for garments when literally origins of clans and temples are destroyed.
M2nKAe
No.97404
ZpE9Qn
No.97407
>>97392
>These are painting and paintings have always drawn people in sexy versions.
Yeah keep coping like that
>there were upper clothing
And this was never the argument chamar. Feels like you're fighting an invincible boogeyman in your head lol.
>>97389
That's for support.
So you agree women just need to only wear their bra and drape saree over it? That's exactly what you were seething about lol.
ZfNFiV
No.97412
ZpE9Qn
No.97421
>>97400
I've asked for evidence for saree over full covering blouse being common before the Muslim and British rule and bullawood didn't create the iconic bikini blouse and you have yet to post any proof.
Women just wearing blouse with no saree or wearing randi bikini blouse like in your pics like bollyrandis do and draping saree over it aren't argument to the contrary. You're just deflecting or making up arguments I've never made.
M2nKAe
No.97426
>>97407
>saar women were naked for 1000 years in europe because naked painting
Literally rope pajeet
ZpE9Qn
No.97431
>>97400
In fact your just proving the fact that this is how pajeetas always wore saree like with these pics lol.
ZpE9Qn
No.97436
>>97426
They also have art depicting daily life as well and they don't walk naked.
J14nPU
No.97438
>>96840(OP)
it's okay yaar
ideally they should just wear a cloth over their breasts and nether regions
at least fatsos will get more motivation to stay in shape
XiTf8f
No.97440
>>97407
>That's for support So you agree women just need to only wear their bra and drape saree over it.
Modern bras are different but yes that was for support. Could be a simple long cloth for ordinary women tied around boobs or shiny decorated tunics for women of nobility.
M2nKAe
No.97447
>>97431
>this is how pajeetas always wore saree
gaand ke andhe look again. There is no cleavage in those pics and even shoulders are covered in one. Chutiya schizo kuch bhi bol rha hai
M2nKAe
No.97452
>>97436
Now the absolute shitridden pajeet cares about some paintings and doesn't go one "cope" mechanism.
M2nKAe
No.97457
My tripcode
>m2nkae
>mankae
>menka
Kek. Isse ek aur cheez yaad aayi,
>the Apsaras were dancing to entertain the gods and sages present. During the dance, Rambha (Menaka or Urvashi) had a wardrobe malfunction her "upper garment" slipped or fell during the performance.
ZpE9Qn
No.97460
ZpE9Qn
No.97462
>>97457
That's not a tripcode you literal coon
M2nKAe
No.97464
>>97462
>saar u didn't use the 4chud accurate term saar
ZpE9Qn
No.97465
>>97457
And I see you still can't read and still resorting to the 'durr they wore upper garments durr' argument. I know madrasa education isn't the best but you should be able to read and grasp stuff lol.
zokiNz
No.97471
Kuch bhi mental fapping karlo tum log pajeetas ko toh bss nangi ghumne hai. Yehi hai inki ideology
M2nKAe
No.97475
>>97460
Just neck yourself pajeet. Not gonna entertain your cooming fantasies anymore. Be coomer retard like you are and go back.
M2nKAe
No.97477
ZpE9Qn
No.97483
>>97475
You'll probably be the first one killing yourself from seethe and anger first seeing more and and more randis including your wife and sister walking out like this. Even dehatijeetas are randifying kek.
M2nKAe
No.97491
>>97483
>seeing more and and more randis including your wife and sister walking out like this
Apne fantasies mat bata pajeet. We know you coom your sisters and mothers to cope. Mulle bhi na yaar
!lmOJk15ILR6OW/a
Lnx8Us
No.97493
>150 replies
The desire for Bokachodas to do western cuckery has been a disaster for the Pajeet race.
w7soCG
No.97495
>>97491
topkek
ZpE9Qn
No.97500
zokiNz
No.97507
>>97491
Kyun bhadwe pajeet dusron ki maa beheno ko kachi mein dekhna hai par apni ko nahi? Chastity for your randi mom but not for others?
ZpE9Qn
No.97515
>>97493
In this 150 reply thread, the only one who ever used the le whitoids do it too argument has been the OP.
M2nKAe
No.97516
>>97500
>saar imagine your mother and sister and wife
>no saar i am totally not projecting my fetishes
Stop embarassing yourself more
laTMtI
No.97519
>>96840(OP)
Navel ungli karni hai...
ZpE9Qn
No.97524
>>97516
Arey mullah I was talking about wanting to fap to your sister and wife like a healthy male and you immediately went ahead and projected your incestous fantasies on to me. The other guy lifting your balls in this thread was the first one who brought up mother's and sisters in this thread. As if any healthy socially adjusted man should feel uncomfortable seeing them even naked lol(most healthy males just in case mullah).
vVdS8x
No.97540
>>97515
Huh?
You ignored my posts >>97277 because you are a stupid ass n1gger with retarded logics to justify actions of whores. Literally like some libtard trying to justify cutting dicks off to become a woman because in hindu mythology, several deities are depicted with gender transitions.
>>97493
Just shut the fuck up, you have made a post where you said that how you and you girlfriend were discussing about a girl wearing revealing clothes and how it's weird. No more (you)s for you btw.
ZpE9Qn
No.97562
>>97540
I ignored that post because it's retarded. It's not even an argument just a whataboutism. This and that are different issues. Unlike this where we have historical and present evidence wearing clothes like this, we got no evidence of magical gender bending tricks neither in present or past.
These are entirely two different issues.
My original argument didn't even make any similarity to ancient dressing practices. I only did so when done retard claimed bollywood created and popularized wearing saree blouse like a croptop(which it didn't).
ZpE9Qn
No.97572
vVdS8x
No.97604
>>97572
>bollywood created and popularized wearing saree blouse like a croptop(which it didn't).
accha
