Recent Posts
guess whose dad among these two gentlemen has got ...
Are all Races equal?
29kw6B
No.154933
Do Different races have difference in IQ? I have had this question for a long time in my mind but Google always gives some bullshit politically correct answer. Why is it that almost all modern inventions/discoveries were done by white/ Jewish people. Indians and Asians have also had some contributions. But the continent of Africa as a whole has nothing to show for. Can you name a single Aircraft/ Automobile/ Weapon system/ invention done by a Subsaharan African? There is none. What is the reason for that? Is there an inherent difference which makes their IQ lower or is it due to bad culture? Also, this is NOT a bait racist thread. Any info on this topic is highly discouraged in academia. Google/chat gpt did not give satisfactory answer. Reddit is out of question.Therefore I am asking here on Bhach.
wHoMDd
No.154938
least obvious bait which will get 400 replies in 1 hour
e3iH6K
No.154946
+3FDxJ
No.154949
>>154933(OP)
Yes. Refer this book for further research.
YasAec
No.154950
>>154933(OP)
Look at the situation of 2 koreas. Single biggest experiment of effect of race on success.
>I wuzz talking about IQ
Meaningless metric except at the extremes.
!lmOJk15ILR6OW/a
X5dqJU
No.154958
+3FDxJ
No.154967
>>154950
Korean example actually proves race and iq correlation. Despite being poor and isolated due to a totalitarian regime, north koreans have higher iq than subsaharans and are able to maintain their nation with scarce resources they have.
29kw6B
No.154972
>>154946
To counter you, i can point to North Africa/ Egypt. Both brown people (Egyptians) and black people (nubians) existed with each other. The former built a civilization, pyramids etc. but the latter did not. Both races had same set of circumstances.
29kw6B
No.154973
>>154950
Makes 0 sense. North Korea had one of the highest gdps per capita in Asia till 1970s. North Korea as a whole has been caught up in a bad political situation. And even taking you face value, North Korea has manufactured missiles, submarines and even nuclear weapons. So there is no comparison to Subsaharan Africa which hasn't produced any technology since forever.
heMCIq
No.154986
>>154973
Wheels were first made in Africa
e3iH6K
No.154990
>>154972
there are more pyramids in sudan than there anywhere else on this planet
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nubian_pyramids
though the egyptians and sudanese don't have the same genetic makeup.
IIPVdj
No.154997
>>154933(OP)
Brahmin hindu🗿>>>>>>>>>>>>all race🤡
e3iH6K
No.154998
>>154973
there are nations in africa that are, contrary to popular belief, well-run and thriving. Botswana is just an example and I suspect will be the first high-income african nation. Defence-spending is based on how militaristic one is and how militaristic one's neighbours are.
YasAec
No.155004
>>154973
A good number of African countries mog the shit out of NK
>we wuzz high gdp in 70s
Any reasonable man would choose Botswana or Ethiopa to live in than North Korea
29kw6B
No.155015
>>155004
Saar i am talking about technological output as well. But yes living conditions are shit in North korea
YasAec
No.155021
>>155015
It is due to climate and geography of Africa. You cannot run behind technology without basic food security. Maslow's hierarchy and shiet. Nobody is denying that Africa is a shithole and not optimal for survival.
AIVmFw
No.155038
>>154998
>botswana.
Selling contracts to corporations to mine diamond. The biggest paradox is that africans despite sitting on the world's most resource rich land are the poorest whereas japanese sitting on the most resource poor land are among the richest.
>there are nations in africa that are, contrary to popular belief, well-run and thriving.
Only a few and they depend on foreign ethnicities like white or chinese engineers and technicians and indian business families. Fun fact indians form 1% of Ugandan population yet they run 40% of their nation's economy. South africa went from one of the best nations to a shithole when apartheid ended and blacks took charge.
mUDeoL
No.155041
>>155038
Sitting on raw material doesn't mean shit if you are not the one to process it and sell it for much more than it was worth. Africa was failed by their retarded warlords and dictators. They could have used their power to introduce rapid industrialization but they didn't. They would rather rule and die raping 6 year olds than accomplishing anything for their kingdom.
AIVmFw
No.155044
>>155004
Why compare NK just a small east asian nation to africa a continent? Why not compare africa to east asia as a whole? By the way show me an african city that looks like Pyongyang.
e3iH6K
No.155048
>>155038
> South africa went from one of the best nations to a shithole when apartheid ended and blacks took charge
Wignats keep saying this, and I understand where they’re coming from, but this is completely incorrect. South africa was doing quite well post apartheid and even hosted the world cup. Modern south africa’s issues are ANC corruption.
> japanese sitting on the most resource poor land are among the richest
Let us consider south korea. Historic centres of korea have always been in the north and the north is magnitudes richer in resources than the south. Yet the north is magnitudes more of a shithole than the south. There is no point in being resource rich if your human capital development is straight dogshit.
> Selling contracts to corporations to mine diamond. The biggest paradox is that africans despite sitting on the world's most resource rich land are the poorest whereas
You’re indicting botswana for being rich by utilising its resources but at the same time lamenting the fact that africans have a deep resource-wealth discrepancy? Besides botswana is no banana republic, its a western liberal demoracy.
YasAec
No.155054
>>155044
>Why compare NK just a small east asian nation to africa a continent?
I didn't. I compared North Korea to various individual African Nations like Botswana, Mauritius, Seychelles: not Africa as a whole.
>By the way show me an african city that looks like Pyongyang.
I'll show you a better city. Picrel is Cairo.
AIVmFw
No.155058
>>155041
>Africa was failed by their retarded warlords and dictators.
And why do you think that is? Is there anything unique about africa that they produce the most incompetent and brutal leaders (a lot of them were literal cannibals)?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elsie_Quinlan
Elsie quinlan was a nun of irish origin working as a doctor in south africa. She was lynched during anti apartheid riots by blacks. HER FLESH WAS EATEN by the mob. It was a fucking mob not some isolated cannibal psycho. Still think blacks really human?
Coming back to topic, Outside west and india, most countries on earth are non democratic yet they are thriving or at least good enough. The simple answer is that national iq is national destiny. Higher iq nations produce better leaders, visionaries, a smarter workforce, more cooperative societies and a smaller population of dumbasses leading to development.
YasAec
No.155061
>>155058
>And why do you think that is? Is there anything unique about africa that they produce the most incompetent and brutal leaders (a lot of them were literal cannibals)?
I could extend the same logic to the Korea situation and ask you why the Koreas are different despite being the same race? Why the North Korean leaders are incompetent and brutal?
It is because of environment.
Nurture beats nature.
29kw6B
No.155074
>>155054
Yaar, Cairo was built by arab looking caucasoids, not sub saharan blacks.
AIVmFw
No.155090
>>155054
I meant that if you start looking for countries in a large continent like africa that are better than NK one of the worst nations on planet then ofc you will find some but it isnt a fair comparison. Try comparing east asia one of the most developed and highest iq regions on earth to subsaharan africa. NK is a minor exception for east asia whereas those moderately good countries in subsahara are exceptions in africa because most of africa is horrible.
>Cairo, egypt.
Yaar pajeet perhaps i should have been pedantic but we are discussing subsaharan africa here. You do get it right? North africans are an extension of middle eastern population. They are semites and racially very different from nigs.
YasAec
No.155096
>>155090
>meant that if you start looking for countries in a large continent like africa that are better than NK one of the worst nations on planet then ofc you will find some but it isnt a fair comparison.
How do you suppose you are going to control for environmental factors(climate, geography, food scarcity, water) and sociological factors(slavery impedes technological progress, and it is not a black only phenomenon as the chattel slavery of antebellum South USA impeded its technology and caused it lose the American civil war)
AIVmFw
No.155099
>>155061
I have said it many times and i will say it again. Compare east asia to africa. Stop talking about exceptions. The worst east asian country is better than the worst or even most african countries.
AIVmFw
No.155117
>>155048
>Historic centres of korea have always been in the north and the north is magnitudes richer in resources than the south.
It was the opposite actually. South korea was the breadbasket historically due to abundant arable plains whereas north korea was mountainous and non arable. It is a major reason why north koreans are starving. Up until the collapse of USSR, NK relied on food imports from russia. They barely grow enough food and sanctions prevent food imports.
AIVmFw
No.155121
>>155096
Its because we have plenty of scientific literature on black and white iq gap, criminality and behaviour clearly establishing genetic factor. Now when you see the state of nigs in both US and africa you can put it all together and know that the state of africa is not due to some muh environment cope. Its racial.
LjgLFI
No.155124
>>154933(OP)
I made this racial system inspired by the lundian caste system
svNKRt
No.155125
YasAec
No.155128
>>155121
>IQ
meme
>criminality
When controlled for poverty, crime rates are not significantly different between races in America
YasAec
No.155129
LjgLFI
No.155135
>>155129
Racial hierarchy based on multifaceted parameters like skin color, IQ, inventions & discoveries
AIVmFw
No.155149
>>155128
>When controlled for poverty, crime rates are not significantly different between races in America.
True but socioeconomic status itself correlates to race. Controlling for socioeconomic status means cherrypicking the cream of the crop of the black race who are higher iq and on statistical extreme of black iq distribution curve. It doesnt disprove race and crime correlation.
