/b/ - Random

>>110981(OP)

/s/ thread got nuked because duck spammed with nsfw images.

>>110983

Problem is that mods are not gonna be moderating every thread or image. And every new post from that board goes to homepage and eventually thread will get nuked.

Maybe a middle ground of sorts. I am hoping for.

>>110988

no.

>>110987

This is responsibility of anons to report the ones which are derailing their threads.

>>110994

I am not going to give more materials to TL.

>>111000

>ai

yes someone posted it

>>110998

Problem is that it goes to homepage, if anons get a leeway for just backless they start spamming all sorts of disgusting stuff.

So once again we will have to contain them - idk how many of you visited kama but it was literally hell.

Okay so far,

>most are against the board

>most want a dedicated general in /b/ - for mostly sfw adjacent non-nsfw

I am okay with a dedicated general with nsfw marker. But no porn in it.

Spam outside it will get nuked.

Reasoning for no porn is legal issue, moderation issue. One attempt at allowing such boards or threads result in all sorts of people posting all sorts of content. We can't moderate every such posts or links being spammed - so we had to get it removed.

It's an imageboard, of course lewd posting is part of it but how do we navigate it within the bounds of legalities is the worry. Considering even before kama - backless tier post and adjacent were the most common such spams. A dedicated thread like that can be allowed - to prevent rest of the board getting spammed.

I hope it makes sense.

i am thinking of two things right now

create two boards

/s/ foidposters, slightly more freedom compared to /b/ but below porn (no mms, no webms of gif adjacent).

another /wp/ - wallpaper board.

>>111032

index mode will be out in next few weeks

overboard has been revamped, with new update you will be asked to choose which boards you want to see posts from - way better than current filter mechanism.

>non-indian ips

nope.

>disclaimer popup

it's important - to convey what rules to follow and data being collected - legal requirement. It is only asked once in like 30 days or so.

>remove-reply captcha

if you have this issue - get account - no additional data nothing - no meta info beyond what is for non-accounts.

>remove cooldown timer

read prev message

>stats

soon

>>111034

okay nvm, you guys for cooldown timer meant that 45min limit.

yes that will be removed in few weeks

>>111042

it kkinda worked, foidposts in december / november was like entire board. Now he has limited to few threads - beyond that if it happens we nuke the threads.

/kama/ yes in a way probably just gave way for slightly different users not for the foidposter atleast.

>>111043

it's not a priority but when it happens we will discuss.

>>111045

>Holy fucking shit yaar, agar abhi hatana nahi hai toh atleast timer ko 15 mins karde. 45 mins is too much. The spammer isn't going to wait for 15 minutes everytime to post after you ban him a few times.

Okay done. Reduced to 15mins.

I don't promise but if we see spam i will dial it back to 45min.

>>111050

yes it does, what's your account name. give me some initials not full name.

>>111057

last initial too please

>>111064

You are old spammer, you will remain banned.

>>111062

Sirs issue is that, mod powers cover all the boards. I think you mean well - but sorry to say no here.

>>111069

No no he is unbanned - no issues with him. Some other anon, check /meta/ he was called out there too.

>>111073

No even before that one anon who was involved in spam. I don't recall all the details but i remember the username kinda.

It's been a month i think.

So let's summarize this again, why /kama/ is not possible on bhach

>legal troubles - hosting a website where porn etc. is being shared is very gray zone

and sustaining those troubles for a board which are inactive is not a good bargain

>moderation - nobody wanted to moderate that place, i had to chip on many a times.

I have requested to report but no reports, i can't be going around looking at every media discerning if something's legal or not. It's not humanely possible not for me not for mods.

>foid posters - they didn't like the /kama/ original reason why kama was created

So entire purpose was moot.

Here we are now. I think we can still have a board but keep it more of bhach-b+++ but less than /kama/. maybe anons can have it like discussion of vtubers, wallpapers misc with insta influencers whatever they usually post.

or another option is this nsfw tagged channel but with a bit similar restrictions as shared earlier.

>>111090

Yaar i am brootaly cucked by indian laws. Just read them - i don't know how multi billion companies like twitter get away with it but it's difficult for imageboards operating from india to have these.

>>111091

It's not that, all the mods - i have little idea about they applied and joined.

I think other anon means well but i don't think it will last more than few weeks - to be highly dependent on one individual to clean up the mess without anything in return.

>>111099

Yes we are not there yet.

>>111109

Problem is owner is located in India.

Bencho running anything in India is so difficult.

You have people who want to doxx you, government who can gape you, retards who can put case on you.

Users who will hate you.

>>111120

may I ask why you are asking this question?

Due to legal reasons this can't be answered.

>>111125

Issue is that's why those were gone within 5months to 6 to 1 year or so.

I want bhach to be legally sound place which can sustain itself when i am no longer involved with this.

Most of the dev work will complete by this year, including the app - android at least. By next year i want to leave major chunk of admin aspect to someone else.

I want it to be a concrete place - which persists like others.

>>111131

How's those answers contradiction to each other exactly? In fact it literally adds to the point i said - ki we are not there yet - as in Bhach with capable lawyers etc. so we will have to go more carefully.

>>111132

That's different. Legal speak.

>>111136

It's less about popularity more about persistence.

If it persists it will inch its name, enough for me to think about the legalities of the issues. Resting myself on the goodwill of the 'indian government' would be the worst thing i can do.

>>111138

First answer my question, why are you asking these questions?

Cuz relevant details has been already shared including explanation - you seem to be goading for something else - framing for something. Your intention doesn't seem alright.

>>111142

>implying opposition is flag bearer of FOE

great duck.

>>111143

hmm sirs, anyway this is not related to overall discussion.

For now anons can have a /s/ general with nsfw tag and wherever required a spoiler tag - I will need to send a patch to avoid any media from nsfw tagged threads on /home/ but in the meantime anons can have leeway.

after a certain time post new update i will look into /s/ and /wp/

>>111158

bhach /b/ is not same as other places, it serves as a default board.

i will not nuke your thread of non-nude pyaaris as long as you guys stick to one general and just have first thread marked as nsfw rest you can keep spoiler or not that's not an issue for now.

sorry for this thread but i have not sure about all of this hence wanted to see what anons want.

>>111148

rules yaar, he was harassed by past anons hence

Summary for those who don't want to bother reading rr posts above,

>/kama/ remains gone

>for now keep a general for /s/ - mark the parent thread as nsfw rest as per your choice - avoid porn in the thread

>/s/ may happen in future with more leeway to ensure we are not in explicit porn category but we are also not in pure sattvick zone

>additionally /wp/ - wallpaper likely to happen

>>111177

thanks for sharing ss from twitter.