Recent Posts
Sirs gtfih
Animals & Nature
Kek brvtal
kya tumne kabhi apne school ya college mein perfor...
bring back /kama/
Ananya Pandey post surgery face
Pakda gaya
Southie bros....
What causes this
Brootal hogya
CoC thread
Àaj to laude lag gaye bc
HAPPENING!!!
brootality
Okay I am leaving this place forever
What was the basis of Maharashtrian identity before Marathas ?


zoz90s
No.134414
was it all Bahmani ?
H+InnG
No.134423
>>134414(OP)
मल्लाह, fisherman


zoz90s
No.134428
>>134423
kneegga wat ?
I know that Koli caste inhabited Mumbai originally before British opened factories there.
Can you elaborate your statement ?
H+InnG
No.134445
>>134428
Aside from average trade, agricultural and rulers satavahans, vakatakas, chalukya, rashtrakutas and jadhava shilahars. I mean be specific with your questions. If you're asking dominant caste then there were always a period in history when a king of specific caste rules and his caste has upper hand. Last being jadhava and silharas of such before bohmani. If your asking majority people, then it was probably kunbis and malah. And marathas most probably came from kunbis which was agrigarian caste.


zoz90s
No.134449
>>134445
was it a united political identity like Punjabis, Tamils and Bengalis or was it a congregation of disunited smaller groups like modern UP ?
H+InnG
No.134453
>>134449
Mostly united under one kingdom. Most of maharshtra was never like UP. Most of it was forests. Nothing like UP


zoz90s
No.134454
>>134453
r u marathi ?
H+InnG
No.134455
>>134454
No


zoz90s
No.134457
>>134455
i can't trust you then. I always think of marathis as disunited people.
Gangsters only gain power when the people are disunited like we have in East UP and Bihar.


zoz90s
No.134460
nvm
9IBD73
No.134514
>>134457
chicks hot tho